Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 18;159(Suppl 1):113–125. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14473

TABLE 2.

Results for WHO standards‐based quality measures a , b , c

Overall (n = 493) No. (%) Women born in Luxembourg (n = 314) No. (%) Women not born in Luxembourg (n = 170) No. (%) P value
Provision of care
1. No pain relief during labor (SVB, IVB, EC before labor) 44/423 (10.4) 27/272 (9.9) 16/142 (11.3) 0.789
2. Mode of birth
2a. SVB 300 (60.9) 183 (58.3) 111 (65.3) 0.131
2b. IVB 70 (14.2) 46 (14.6) 22 (12.9) 0.606
2c. EC after labor 53 (10.8) 43 (13.7) 9 (5.3) 0.004
2d. EC before labor 18 (3.7) 10 (3.2) 8 (4.7) 0.399
2e. Elective cesarean 52 (10.5) 32 (10.2) 20 (11.8) 0.594
3a. Episiotomy (in SVB) 45/300 (15.0) 28/183 (15.3) 13/111 (11.7) 0.389
3b. Fundal pressure (in IVB) 21/70 (30.0) 15/46 (32.6) 5/22 (22.7) 0.403
3c. No pain relief after cesarean 14/123 (11.4) 8/85 (9.4) 6/37 (16.2) 0.278
4. No skin‐to‐skin contact 3 (0.6) 3 (1.0) 0 (0.0) 0.672
5. No early breastfeeding 26 (5.3) 21 (6.7) 4 (2.4) 0.043
6. Inadequate breastfeeding support 80 (16.2) 53 (16.9) 26 (15.3) 0.748
7. No rooming‐in 29 (5.9) 20 (6.4) 9 (5.3) 0.783
8. Not allowed to stay with the baby as wished 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6) 0.351
9. No exclusive breastfeeding at discharge 133 (27.0) 92 (29.3) 38 (22.4) 0.124
10. No immediate attention when needed 101 (20.5) 68 (21.7) 30 (17.6) 0.353
Experience of care
1a. No freedom of movements during labor 60/423 (14.2) 41/272 (15.1) 19/142 (13.4) 0.639
1b. No consent requested for vaginal examination before prelabor cesarean 13/70 (18.6) 7/42 (16.7) 6/28 (21.4) 0.616
2a. No choice of birth position (in SVB) 118/300 (39.3) 69/183 (37.7) 47/111 (42.3) 0.430
2b. No consent requested (for IVB) 30/70 (42.9) 17/46 (37.0) 13/22 (59.1) 0.085
2c. No information on newborn (after cesarean) 25/123 (20.3) 13/85 (15.3) 12/37 (32.4) 0.031
3. No clear/effective communication from HCP 81 (16.4) 50 (15.9) 28 (16.5) 0.979
4. No involvement in choices 107 (21.7) 68 (21.7) 37 (21.8) 1.000
5. Companionship not allowed 104 (21.1) 74 (23.6) 27 (15.9) 0.062
6. Not treated with dignity 66 (13.4) 49 (15.6) 16 (9.4) 0.077
7. No emotional support 97 (19.7) 65 (20.7) 30 (17.6) 0.492
8. No privacy 50 (10.1) 36 (11.5) 13 (7.6) 0.241
9. Abuse (physical/verbal/emotional) 45 (9.1) 27 (8.6) 17 (10.0) 0.729
10. Informal payment 41 (8.3) 33 (10.5) 6 (3.5) 0.012
Availability of physical and human resources
1a. No timely care by HCPs at facility arrival 54 (11.0) 41 (13.1) 10 (5.9) 0.021
2. No information on maternal danger signs 145 (29.4) 92 (29.3) 51 (30.0) 0.955
3. No information on newborn danger signs 203 (41.2) 130 (41.4) 70 (41.2) 1.000
4. Inadequate room comfort and equipment 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1.000
5. Inadequate number of women per rooms 21 (4.3) 19 (6.1) 1 (0.6) 0.003
6. Inadequate room cleaning 6 (1.2) 5 (1.6) 1 (0.6) 0.670
7. Inadequate bathroom 8 (1.6) 5 (1.6) 1 (0.6) 0.786
8. Inadequate partner visiting hours 112 (22.7) 77 (24.5) 31 (18.2) 0.141
9. Inadequate number of HCPs 42 (8.5) 24 (7.6) 16 (9.4) 0.616
10. Inadequate HCP professionalism 8 (1.6) 5 (1.6) 2 (1.2) 1.000
Reorganizational changes due to COVID‐19
1. Difficulties in attending routine antenatal visits 178 (36.1) 117 (37.3) 57 (33.5) 0.473
2. Any barriers in accessing the facility 151 (30.6) 106 (33.8) 42 (24.7) 0.050
3. Inadequate info graphics 8 (1.6) 5 (1.6) 2 (1.2) 1.000
4. Inadequate ward reorganization 82 (16.6) 55 (17.5) 25 (14.7) 0.505
5. Inadequate room reorganization 92 (18.7) 60 (19.1) 28 (16.5) 0.552
6. Lacking one functioning accessible hand‐washing station 26 (5.3) 19 (6.1) 6 (3.5) 0.326
7. HCP not always using PPE 27 (5.5) 21 (6.7) 5 (2.9) 0.093
8. Insufficient HCP number 101 (20.5) 72 (22.9) 27 (15.9) 0.086
9. Communication inadequate to contain COVID‐19‐related stress 124 (25.2) 77 (24.5) 44 (25.9) 0.826
10. Reduction in QMNC due to COVID‐19 194 (39.4) 139 (44.3) 49 (28.8) 0.001

Abbreviations: EC, emergency cesarean; HCP, healthcare professional; IVB, instrumental vaginal birth; PPE, personal protective equipment; QMNC, quality of maternal and newborn care; SVB, spontaneous vaginal birth.

a

All the indicators in the domains of provision of care, experience of care, and resources are directly based on WHO standards.

b

Indicators with a specified denominator identified (e.g. 3a, 3b) were tailored to take into account different mode of birth (i.e. spontaneous vaginal, instrumental vaginal, and cesarean). These were calculated on subsamples (e.g. 3a was calculated on spontaneous vaginal births; 3b was calculated on instrumental vaginal births).

c

Indicator 6 in the domain of reorganizational changes due to COVID‐19 was defined as: at least one functioning and accessible hand‐washing station (near or inside the room where the mother was hospitalized) supplied with water and soap or with disinfectant alcohol solution.