Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 18;159(Suppl 1):70–84. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14456

TABLE 3.

Key quality measures of QMNC by mode of birth a , b , c

Key quality measures of QMNC (40 items) Spontaneous vaginal birth Instrumental vaginal birth Emergency cesarean during labor Emergency cesarean before labor Planned or elective cesarean adj P value d
No. (%) (n = 698) No. (%) (n = 134) No. (%) (n = 111) No. (%) (n = 67) No. (%) (n = 165)
Provision of care
1 No pain relief during labor (for SVB, IVB, emergency cesarean during labor) 122 (17.5) 5 (3.7) 7 (6.3) <0.001
2a Mode of birth: Instrumental vaginal birth 134 (100.0)
2b Mode of birth: emergency cesarean during labor 111 (100.0)
2c Mode of birth: Emergency cesarean before labor 67 (100.0)
2d Mode of birth: Planned or elective cesarean 165 (100.0)
3a Episiotomy (in SVB) 64 (9.2)
3b Fundal pressure (in IVB) 22 (16.4)
3c No pain relief after cesarean 9 (8.1) 10 (14.9) 12 (7.3) 0.598
4 No skin to skin 7 (1.0) 3 (2.2) 21 (18.9) 10 (14.9) 19 (11.5) <0.001
5 No early breastfeeding 36 (5.2) 15 (11.2) 19 (17.1) 10 (14.9) 39 (23.6) <0.001
6 Inadequate breastfeeding support 112 (16.0) 31 (23.1) 17 (15.3) 13 (19.4) 24 (14.5) 0.647
7 No rooming‐in 74 (10.6) 27 (20.1) 29 (26.1) 33 (49.3) 37 (22.4) 0.002
8 Not allowed to stay with the baby as wished 15 (2.1) 2 (1.5) 5 (4.5) 10 (14.9) 5 (3.0) 0.287
9 No exclusive breastfeeding at discharge 123 (17.6) 38 (28.4) 34 (30.6) 25 (37.3) 58 (35.2) <0.001
10 No immediate attention when needed 119 (17.0) 28 (20.9) 28 (25.2) 18 (26.9) 34 (20.6) 0.014
Experience of care
1a No freedom of movement during labor 51 (7.3) 21 (15.7) 18 (16.2) 0.001
1b No consent requested for vaginal examination in prelabor cesarean 9 (13.4) 11 (6.7) 0.117
2a No choice of birth position (in SVB) 238 (34.1)
2b No consent requested (for IVB) 54 (40.3)
2c No information on newborn after cesarean 9 (8.1) 10 (14.9) 12 (7.3) 0.032
3 No clear/effective communication from HCP 107 (15.3) 27 (20.1) 28 (25.2) 18 (26.9) 32 (19.4) 0.057
4 No involvement in choices 132 (18.9) 30 (22.4) 34 (30.6) 23 (34.3) 26 (15.8) 0.037
5 Companionship not allowed 235 (33.7) 45 (33.6) 39 (35.1) 29 (43.3) 50 (30.3) 0.636
6 Not treated with dignity 75 (10.7) 14 (10.4) 22 (19.8) 17 (25.4) 17 (10.3) 0.005
7 No emotional support 105 (15.0) 36 (26.9) 42 (37.8) 17 (25.4) 29 (17.6) <0.001
8 No privacy 57 (8.2) 14 (10.4) 18 (16.2) 13 (19.4) 14 (8.5) 0.167
9 Abuse (physical/verbal/emotional) 58 (8.3) 18 (13.4) 14 (12.6) 11 (16.4) 12 (7.3) 0.360
10 Informal payment 19 (2.7) 9 (6.7) 4 (3.6) 2 (3.0) 5 (3.0) 0.293
Availability of physical and human resources
1 No timely care by HCPs at facility arrival 54 (7.7) 11 (8.2) 12 (10.8) 11 (16.4) 4 (2.4) 0.024
2 No information on maternal danger signs 231 (33.1) 48 (35.8) 47 (42.3) 24 (35.8) 51 (30.9) 0.261
3 No information on newborn danger signs 284 (40.7) 66 (49.3) 49 (44.1) 26 (38.8) 62 (37.6) 0.435
4 Inadequate room comfort and equipment 8 (1.1) 1 (0.7) 1 (0.9) 1 (1.5) 0 (0.0) 0.871
5 Inadequate number of women per rooms 38 (5.4) 10 (7.5) 4 (3.6) 3 (4.5) 6 (3.6) 0.465
6 Inadequate room cleaning 5 (0.7) 1 (0.7) 1 (0.9) 3 (4.5) 0 (0.0) 0.111
7 Inadequate bathroom 19 (2.7) 1 (0.7) 2 (1.8) 2 (3.0) 0 (0.0) 0.726
8 Inadequate partner visiting hours 169 (24.2) 38 (28.4) 31 (27.9) 14 (20.9) 37 (22.4) 0.371
9 Inadequate HCP number 57 (8.2) 16 (11.9) 18 (16.2) 10 (14.9) 11 (6.7) 0.022
10 Inadequate HCP professionalism 7 (1.0) 1 (0.7) 2 (1.8) 3 (4.5) 5 (3.0) 0.256
Reorganizational changes due to COVID‐19
1 Difficulties in attending routine antenatal visits 133 (19.1) 20 (14.9) 15 (13.5) 21 (31.3) 49 (29.7) 0.001
2 Any barriers in accessing the facility 101 (14.5) 14 (10.4) 20 (18.0) 11 (16.4) 37 (22.4) 0.078
3 Inadequate infographics 104 (14.9) 21 (15.7) 21 (18.9) 17 (25.4) 26 (15.8) 0.521
4 Inadequate wards reorganization 155 (22.2) 25 (18.7) 21 (18.9) 24 (35.8) 25 (15.2) 0.041
5 Inadequate room reorganization 189 (27.1) 41 (30.6) 32 (28.8) 22 (32.8) 40 (24.2) 0.613
6 Lacking one functioning accessible hand‐washing station 25 (3.6) 4 (3.0) 5 (4.5) 4 (6.0) 4 (2.4) 0.957
7 HCPs not always using PPE 58 (8.3) 10 (7.5) 9 (8.1) 9 (13.4) 14 (8.5) 0.706
8 Insufficient number of HCPs 124 (17.8) 28 (20.9) 26 (23.4) 21 (31.3) 32 (19.4) 0.071
9 Communication inadequate to contain COVID‐19‐related stress 134 (19.2) 26 (19.4) 31 (27.9) 26 (38.8) 38 (23.0) 0.001
10 Reduction in QMNC due to COVID‐19 181 (25.9) 34 (25.4) 43 (38.7) 25 (37.3) 45 (27.3) 0.083

Abbreviations: HCP, healthcare professional; IVB, instrumental vaginal birth; PPE, personal protective equipment; QMNC, quality of maternal and newborn care; SVB, spontaneous vaginal birth.

a

All the indicators in the domains of provision of care, experience of care, and resources are directly based on WHO standards.

b

Indicators with a specified denominator (e.g. 3a, 3b) were tailored to take into account different mode of birth (i.e. spontaneous vaginal, instrumental vaginal, and cesarean). These were calculated on subsamples (e.g. 3a was calculated on spontaneous vaginal births; 3b was calculated on instrumental vaginal births).

c

Indicator 6 in the domains of reorganizational changes due to COVID‐19 was defined as: at least one functioning and accessible hand‐washing station (near or inside the room where the mother was hospitalized) supplied with water and soap or with disinfectant alcohol solution.

d

P values were obtained from the logistic regression model testing quality measures difference by mode of birth adjusted for sociodemographic and obstetric variables (i.e. maternal age, education, year of birth, parity, presence of an obstetrician/gynecologist at birth, multiple birth), language of questionnaire completion, type of hospital, newborn admission to neonatal intensive care or special care baby unit, and mother's admission to intensive care. Bold values are statistically significant.