Table 3.
EQ-5D-3L Utility and Disutility: general population, caregivers and caregivers by ambulatory status
EQ-5D-3L utilities | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Caregivers versus general population | N | Mean | SD | |
Total sample | ||||
General population | 36 | 0.849 | 0.218 | |
Caregivers | 36 | 0.772 | 0.178 |
Excluding patient-caregivera | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
General population | 35 | 0.871 | 0.122 | |
Caregivers | 35 | 0.778 | 0.219 |
Caregivers by ambulatory status | N | Mean | SD | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Requires no assistance walking | 12 | 0.819 | 0.126 | |
Requires assistance with walking | 21 | 0.754 | 0.266 | |
Requires wheelchair | 2 | 0.787 | 0.087 | |
Bedriddenb | 1 | 0.585 | – |
Estimated EQ-5D-3L disutilitiesC by ambulatory status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Predictors in regression model | Without covariates | With covariates | ||
Coefficient (disutility) | SE | Coefficient (disutility) | SE | |
Total sample | ||||
General population | Ref | Ref | ||
Requires no assistance walking | − 0.031 | 0.067 | − 0.036 | 0.066 |
Requires assistance with walking | − 0.096 | 0.055 | − 0.101 | 0.055 |
Requires wheelchair/bedridden | − 0.130 | 0.121 | − 0.110 | 0.121 |
Age | – | – | − 0.003 | 0.002 |
Gender | – | – | − 0.059 | 0.061 |
Not employed vs. employed (ref.) | – | – | − 0.053 | 0.053 |
Excluding patient-caregivera | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
General population | Ref | Ref | ||
Requires no assistance walking | − 0.053 | 0.060 | − 0.036 | 0.066 |
Requires assistance with walking | − 0.118* | 0.049 | − 0.101 | 0.055 |
Requires wheelchair/bedridden | − 0.085 | 0.130 | − 0.110 | 0.121 |
Age | – | – | − 0.003 | 0.002 |
Gender | – | – | − 0.059 | 0.061 |
Not employed vs. employed (ref.) | – | – | − 0.053 | 0.053 |
aSample excluding patient-caregiver (n=1) and corresponding matched control (n=1).
bThe caregiver utility value for the bedridden patient is that of the patient-caregiver (n=1).
cEstimated using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression
*p<0.05