Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 26;2023(1):CD012144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012144.pub3

Dickmann 1988.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel group RCT
Setting: inpatient admissions to the neurology unit of one hospital in Göttingen, Germany
Dates: not described
Participants Sample size: 46 participants
Diagnosis: ICH
Inclusion criteria: diagnosis of ICH by CT with onset 24 hours before admission
Exclusion criteria: bleeding diathesis, diastolic blood pressure higher than 120 mmHg, and deep coma with clinical signs of brain herniation
Age (years, mean (SD)): 62 (SD not described) (intervention group), 60 (SD not described) (comparator group)
Sex: 52% female (intervention group), 48% female (comparator group)
Interventions Intervention: 5000 units of heparin administered subcutaneously 8‐hourly starting at day 4 (23 participants)
Comparator: 5000 units of heparin subcutaneously 8‐hourly starting at day 10 (23 participants)
Both groups had the same treatment otherwise, with compression stockings and physical treatment
Outcomes Primary outcome: not specified
Secondary outcomes: not specified
Outcomes: rebleeding occurring during the trial period; thrombosis of abdomen or legs at day 2 and day 10; pulmonary embolism at day 10; death
Duration: the duration of follow‐up is not specified, but is assumed to be 10 days
Notes Declations of interest: not described
Sources of funding: not described
Rebleeding was not defined by the authors of this study
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk This was an open trial, comparing two timings of heparin
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: "All scintigrams were read by the same blinded investigators"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Outcome data were complete
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes planned in the Methods section were reported in full in the Results section. Additionally, most expected outcomes of interest were reported in this study