Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Surg Res (Houst). 2022 Sep 14;5(3):511–525. doi: 10.26502/jsr.10020251

Table 8:

Significant associations between breast conservative surgery or mastectomy in univariate analysis.

Conservative Mastectomy Chi-2
Nb % Nb % p-value
All patients 733 45 896 55
Period P1 103 14.1 177 19.8 0.002
P2 220 30 283 31.6
P3 410 55.9 436 48.7
Subtypes Luminal A 151 20.6 242 27 <0.0001
Luminal B Her2− 90 12.3 108 12.1
Luminal B Her2+ 129 17.6 173 19.3
Her2+ 76 10.4 144 16.1
Triple Negative 285 38.9 228 25.4
Luminal Her2− Grade? 2 0.3 1 0.1
cT stage cT0-1 127 17.3 113 12.6 <0.0001
cT2 509 69.4 426 47.5
cT3 85 11.6 265 29.6
cT4 12 1.6 92 10.3
cN stage cN0 423 57.7 367 41 <0.0001
cN1 302 41.2 515 57.4
cNx 8 1.1 14 1.6
ypT ypT0 246 33.6 274 30.6 0.274
ypTis 70 9.5 77 8.6
ypT >= 1 417 56.9 545 60.8
pCR Yes 273 37.2 288 32.1 0.018
No 460 62.8 608 67.9

Abbreviations: cT, clinical tumor size stage; cN, clinical lymph node status; ypT, pathologic tumor status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pCR, pathologic complete response.