Akgun 2012 [15] (abstract) |
Turkey |
4672 |
retrospective cohort |
CV/infertility |
Low |
High |
High |
In women with CV, 32.9% women were infertile; in women without CV, 5.58% were infertile (P < .05). |
Rocchetti 2011 [55] |
Brazil |
405 |
cross-sectional analytical |
vaginal flora/group B strep colonization |
Low |
Moderate |
Low |
In women with group B strep colonization compared to not having group B strep colonization, the odds of CV was 2.717 (95% CI, 1.075–6.866). |
Zidovsky 1963 [74] |
Czech Republic |
953 |
retrospective cohort |
CV /fetal impairment |
Moderate |
Moderate |
High |
In women with CV, 18.0% (95% CI, 12.1%-33.9%) of infants were impaired/died; in women without CV 3.9% (95% CI, 2.7%-5.9%) of infants were impaired or died. |
Dysplasia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasiell 1972 [49] |
Sweden |
440 |
cross-sectional analytical |
CV/cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer |
Low |
Moderate |
High |
In women with invasive carcinoma, 4% had CV compared to 12% in women with carcinoma in situ; 9% in women with dysplasia; and 19% in controls. (No statistical tests were done on these figures.) |
Silva 2014 [61] |
Brazil |
3390 |
retrospective cohort |
CV/HPV and cervical intraepithelial lesions |
Low |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Prevalence of CV among women with low-grade intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) or lesions of undetermined significance that evolved to high-grade intra-epithelial lesion (HSIL) was 3.7% (15/409), compared to a prevalence of 5.8% (175/2981) in women with lesions that did not evolve into HSIL. The study indicates that statistical testing was done but did not provide this information. |
Vieira-Baptista 2017 [65] (abstract) |
Portugal |
1022 |
cross-sectional analytical |
CV/HPV infection and cervical dysplasia |
Low |
Low |
High |
In women with an abnormal Pap result compared to women with a normal Pap result, the prevalence of CV was 3.5% vs 2.6%, P = .4. In women with HR-HPV positive compared to women HR-HPV negative, the prevalence of CV was 2.7% vs 3.5%, P = 0.5. In women with a cervical biopsy with high-grade lesions compared to low-grade lesions, the prevalence of CV was 4.2% vs 1.8%, P = .3. |
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moghaddam 2009 [47] |
Iran |
415 |
case control |
lactobacillus flora/vaginal candidiasis |
High |
High |
High |
In women with candidiasis, 9% had findings of CV compared to 25% in women without candidiasis (chi-squared test appears to have been used to analyze the results between the three types of flora and P reported as < .0001. However, we recalculated and P should be < .001). |
Vieira-Baptista 2017 [64] (abstract) |
Portugal |
291 |
case control |
vaginal flora/vulvodynia |
Low |
Low |
Moderate |
In women with vulvodynia compared to women without vulvodynia, the odds of CV are 4.593 (95% CI, 1.890–11.160). |