Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 26;20(4):670–687. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.08.016

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The antioxidant activity of the predictive biomarker pipecolic acid

Impact of pipecolic acid on ROS production induced by Rosup (A) or H2O2 (B) in Eca109 and KYSE150 cells. The influence of pipecolic acid on the expression of the DNA damage marker γ-H2AX induced by Rosup (C) or H2O2 (D) in Eca109 and KYSE150 cells, respectively. The influence of pipecolic acid on the production of the DNA oxidative damage marker 8-oxo-dG induced by Rosup (E) or H2O2 (F) in Eca109 and KYSE150 cells, respectively. The impact of pipecolic acid on the proliferation and PCNA expression of Eca109 and KYSE150 cells treated with Rosup (G) or H2O2 (H). Error bars represent mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ns, no significance (two-tailed Student’s t-test). Pipe, pipecolic acid; ROS, reactive oxygen species; 8-oxo-dG, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-20-deoxyguanosine; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen.