Fig. 8.

Performance of participants during the AR-PHAM training. Participants in the CG_AR experienced an average increase in performance of + 31.25% during training while participants in the EG experienced a + 16.88% increase over the same time period. Despite a greater change in performance, the EG still outperformed the CG_AR in the final training session: 59.38% vs 47.5%. Error bars denote standard deviation. *Denotes $p<0.05$ for the Mann–Whitney Test. Sample size, $N=4$