Table 3.
Statistical analysis for 77, 80, and 32 blockers in S1 and S2 binding pocket using the models obtained from the SILCS LGFE scores, PPM, and consensus SILCS-PPM ranking.
| Docking Scores | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| 77 compounds | 80 compounds | 32 compounds | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| MUE | R | PI | PC | MUE | R | PI | PC | MUE | R | PI | PC | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| S1 | 1.298 | 0.416 | 0.442 | 0.641 | 1.550 | −0.078 | 0.066 | 0.511 | 1.888 | 0.235 | 0.267 | 0.589 |
| S2 | 1.567 | 0.441 | 0.456 | 0.643 | 1.845 | −0.014 | 0.143 | 0.549 | 2.055 | 0.227 | 0.297 | 0.607 |
| BML S1 | 0.888 | 0.625 | 0.647 | 0.732 | 0.922 | 0.516 | 0.510 | 0.672 | 1.720 | 0.313 | 0.207 | 0.560 |
| BML S2 | 1.185 | 0.646 | 0.659 | 0.738 | 1.345 | 0.532 | 0.541 | 0.686 | 1.904 | 0.363 | 0.392 | 0.613 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Docking Scores + PPM | ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| S1 | 0.824 | 0.692 | 0.721 | 0.757 | 0.803 | 0.519 | 0.565 | 0.691 | 1.341 | 0.566 | 0.592 | 0.692 |
| S2 | 0.822 | 0.691 | 0.707 | 0.749 | 0.796 | 0.529 | 0.575 | 0.699 | 1.315 | 0.562 | 0.549 | 0.679 |
| BML S1 | 0.789 | 0.713 | 0.738 | 0.766 | 0.724 | 0.624 | 0.629 | 0.722 | 1.341 | 0.558 | 0.539 | 0.663 |
| BML S2 | 0.775 | 0.722 | 0.745 | 0.771 | 0.711 | 0.648 | 0.642 | 0.725 | 1.320 | 0.585 | 0.56 | 0.681 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| PPM | ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| MLR | 0.822 | 0.691 | 0.707 | 0.749 | 0.816 | 0.516 | 0.568 | 0.690 | 1.382 | 0.540 | 0.576 | 0.679 |