Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2023 Apr 5:2023.01.12.523790. Originally published 2023 Jan 15. [Version 2] doi: 10.1101/2023.01.12.523790

Table 2.

Comparison of R9 and R10 sequencing of the HG002 cell line.

Benchmark HG002 R9 HG002 R10 kit V14

Assembly benchmarks

Asm. size 2.896 Gb 2.927 Gb
Asm. NG50 21.4 Mb 14.9 Mb
Asm. phase block N50 1.010 Mb 0.99 Mb
Asm. SNP switch 0.00165 0.0015
Asm. QV 34.3 42.8
Asm. SNP recall / precision 0.9795/0.9528 0.9851 / 0.9856

Small variant calls benchmarks (recall / precision)

SNP (GIAB Tier 1) 0.997 / 0.9982 0.9979 / 0.998
Indel (GIAB Tier 1) 0.7217 / 0.8715 0.8495 / 0.8991
Indel (no homopol. or tandem repeats) 0.9609 / 0.9807 0.9970 / 0.9969
Indel (RefSeq CDS) 0.9121 / 0.9342 0.9948 / 0.9748

Structural variant benchmarks (recall / precision)

SV (GIAB Tier1) 0.9782 / 0.9557 0.975 / 0.9595
SV (HPRC non-Cen non-SD) 0.9689 / 0.9685 0.9764 / 0.9835
SV (HPRC only SD) 0.4921 / 0.6064 0.5277 / 0.6355

Substantial improvements in different categories are highlighted in bold. Benchmarks were performed using the methods described above in the manuscript.