Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 19;12(2):1984–1996. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5043

TABLE 2.

Estimates of the two‐sample MR analyses for causal associations between MDD and overall breast cancer risk

Outcomes SNPs Participants N (case/control) MR estimates, per log‐odds ratio increment of MDD Pleiotropy effects
IVW Weighted median MR‐PRESSO corrected MR‐Egger regression Intercept
OR (95% CI) P‐value Pheter OR (95% CI) P‐value OR (95% CI) P‐value Intercept (SE) P‐value
Breast cancer 92 228,951 (122,977/105,974) 1.087 (1.011–1.170) 0.025 < 0.001 1.091 (1.002–1.189) 0.046 1.090 (1.017–1.168) 0.016 −0.0004 (0.006) 0.946
ER+ Breast cancer 92 175,475 (69,501/105,974) 1.059 (0.969–1.157) 0.208 < 0.001 1.049 (0.945–1.165) 0.367 1.059 (0.974–1.152) 0.179 −0.0036 (0.0069) 0.599
ER‐ Breast cancer 92 127,442 (21,468/105,974) 1.163 (0.994–1.361) 0.060 0.303 1.100 (0.989–1.224) 0.078 1.101 (0.990–1.224) 0.081 0.000 (0.008) 0.991

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidential interval; ER, estrogen receptor; IVW, inverse variance weighted; MR, Mendelian Randomization; MR‐PRESSO, MR‐pleiotropy residual sum and outlier; OR, odds ratio; P‐heter, P‐heterogneity; SE, standard error; SNP, single‐nucleotide polymorphism.