Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 27;36(2):422–429. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz595

Table 2.

The comparison of performance on the first CAFA3 challenge dataset

Method F  max  
S  min  
AUPR
MFO BPO CCO MFO BPO CCO MFO BPO CCO
Naive 0.290 0.357 0.562 10.733 25.028 8.465 0.130 0.254 0.456
DiamondBLAST 0.431 0.399 0.506 10.233 25.320 8.800 0.178 0.116 0.142
DiamondScore 0.509 0.427 0.557 9.031 22.860 8.198 0.340 0.267 0.335
DeepGO 0.393 0.435 0.565 9.635 24.181 9.199 0.303 0.385 0.579
DeepGOCNN 0.420 0.378 0.607 9.711 24.234 8.153 0.355 0.323 0.616
DeepGOPlus 0.544 0.469 0.623 8.724 22.573 7.823 0.487 0.404 0.627

Best performance in bold. Fmax and AUPR, highest; Smin, lowest.