Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 23;220(4):e20220686. doi: 10.1084/jem.20220686

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

STAT3 cooperates with BATF and IRF4 to mediate Texterm cell development. (A) Enrichment of known transcription factor–binding motifs in DA OCR peaks between WT and Stat3−/− OT-I TILs. The x and y axes represent the logP value and fold change of motif enrichment separately. Targeted motifs were compared to the whole genome background to calculate the P value and fold change. (B) Peak plots for read density profiles of BATF, IRF4, TCF1, and T-bet occupations centered on pSTAT3-binding peaks in CD8+ T cells (GEO accession nos. GSE54191, GSM5016615, and GSE96724). Values were normalized to the total number of reads. P value by Chi-squared test was added in the plot. (C) Signal values of pSTAT3-binding peaks in IL-6–, IL-10–, and IL-21–stimulated CD8+ T cells at BATF- or IRF4-binding sites or not. (D) Violin plots showing the signal values of OCR peaks in WT and Stat3−/− OT-I TILs at BATF- or IRF4-binging sites. (E) Peak plots showing the deposition of H3K27ac modification centered on BATF- or IRF4-binging sites in WT and Stat3−/− OT-I TILs. P value by Fisher test was added in the plot. (F) GSEA results for comparing the enrichment of BATF- and IRF4-regulated feature genes in the transcriptomes of WT and Stat3−/− OT-I TILs (GEO accession nos. GSE154745 and GSE84820). NES, normalized enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate q-value. FDR presented as −log10(FDR). (G) Venn diagrams of pSTAT3 and BATF-cobinding genes and BATF-regulated genes (left panel), or of pSTAT3 and IRF4-cobinding genes and IRF4-regulated genes (right panel) in CD8+ T cells. (H) Aligned ChIP-seq tracks of pSTAT3, BATF, and IRF4 in CD8+ T cells, ATAC-seq tracks of WT and Stat3−/− OT-I TILs, and H3K27ac ChIP-seq tracks of WT and Stat3−/− CD8+ T cells at the specific gene loci. (I) ChIP assays were performed with in vitro IL-10–stimulated WT and Stat3−/− CD8+ T cells with anti-BATF or anti-IRF4. The relative amount of immune-precipitated DNA was detected by real-time PCR and normalized relative to the input control. Data are representative of two (I) independent experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (C, D, and I).