Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 14;17(1):122–134. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.1.122

Table 4. ORs of gastric cancer by the combination of potentially protective food groups.

Variables* No. of cases/controls Model I1) Model II2)
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Soy products & fruits
Low/Low 31/19 1.00 Ref. 1.00 Ref.
Low/High 18/22 0.43 (0.16–1.17) 0.37 (0.13–1.05)
High/Low 22/21 0.40 (0.15–1.07) 0.33 (0.12–0.94)
High/High 11/20 0.25 (0.08–0.76) 0.20 (0.06–0.67)
Soy products & vegetables
Low/Low 29/26 1.00 Ref. 1.00 Ref.
Low/High 20/15 2.04 (0.72–5.75) 2.38 (0.81–7.01)
High/Low 11/14 0.57 (0.19–1.67) 0.59 (0.20–1.80)
High/High 22/27 0.68 (0.27–1.72) 0.85 (0.32–2.24)
Soy products & dairy products
Low/Low 31/24 1.00 Ref. 1.00 Ref.
Low/High 18/17 0.81 (0.31–2.10) 0.87 (0.33–2.34)
High/Low 19/16 0.69 (0.25–1.87) 0.68 (0.24–1.93)
High/High 14/25 0.32 (0.12–0.83) 0.28 (0.10–0.78)
Fruits & vegetables
Low/Low 28/23 1.00 Ref. 1.00 Ref.
Low/High 25/17 1.30 (0.49–3.43) 2.22 (0.76–6.55)
High/Low 12/17 0.52 (0.19–1.45) 0.55 (0.19–1.58)
High/High 17/25 0.67 (0.23–1.94) 0.99 (0.32–3.02)
Fruits & dairy products
Low/Low 35/23 1.00 Ref. 1.00 Ref.
Low/High 18/17 0.62 (0.24–1.59) 0.71 (0.27–1.88)
High/Low 15/17 0.57 (0.21–1.57) 0.53 (0.19–1.50)
High/High 14/25 0.32 (0.11–0.92) 0.28 (0.09–0.83)
Vegetables & dairy products
Low/Low 31/25 1.00 Ref. 1.00 Ref.
Low/High 9/15 0.38 (0.12–1.16) 0.39 (0.12–1.26)
High/Low 19/15 1.24 (0.46–3.37) 1.43 (0.49–4.14)
High/High 23/27 0.80 (0.32–2.01) 1.12 (0.42–2.99)

OR, odds ratios; CI, confidence interval.

1)Model I: adjusted for age, sex body mass index (≤ 22.99, 23.0–24.99, ≥ 25, or missing), education level (≤ middle school, ≥ high school, or missing), family history of gastric cancer (no or yes), smoking status (never, past, or current smokers), alcohol consumption (never, past, < 20 g/day for women or < 40 g/day for men, or ≥ 20 g/day for women or ≥ 40 g/day for men), hospital (Chungnam University Hospital or Hanyang University Guri Hospital), and total energy intake (continuous).

2)Model II: model I + further adjusted for log intakes of each other food groups.

*In each food group, those above the median value were classified as high intake, while those below the median value were classified as low intake.