Table 5.

PR-AUC scores obtained in the fine-tuning experiments.

Features	Coswara			Coughvid	Cambridge KDD			Cambridge npj
	C	B	CB	C	C	B	CB	C	B	CB
YAMNET	.52	.59	.57	.54	.70	.73	.74	.57	.56	.61
VGGish	.57	.63	.62	.59	.69	.75	.74	.57	.58	.60
L3 E 512 L	.68	.62	.65	.54	.68	.72	.66	.57	.55	.57
L3 E 512 M128	.60	.63	.59	.55	.75	.62	.70	.57	.58	.58
L3 E 512 M256	.63	.58	.67	.57	.75	.70	.66	.60	.57	.61
L3 E 6144 L	.60	.69	.59	.53	.74	.68	.73	.56	.54	.55
L3 E 6144 M128	.70	.67	.62	.57	.47	.70	.70	.59	.55	.57
L3 E 6144 M256	.63	.56	.58	.56	.57	.67	.69	.58	.60	.57
L3 M 512 L	.57	.55	.65	.56	.75	.85	.55	.58	.58	.60
L3 M 512 M128	.58	.57	.58	.57	.72	.75	.76	.58	.61	.61
L3 M 512 M256	.56	.67	.64	.54	.71	.76	.75	.57	.61	.62
L3 M 6144 L	.61	.56	.67	.56	.64	.76	.61	.56	.53	.59
L3 M 6144 M128	.58	.54	.60	.56	.75	.64	.73	.60	.58	.61
L3 M 6144 M256	.68	.66	.63	.56	.81	.59	.72	.57	.57	.60