Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 24;24(10):2777–2787. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000859

Table 3.

Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) (95 % CI) of mortality by quintile of diet quality scores*

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 P-linear trend Continuous exposure
HEI-2015
  Quintile median 36 45 51 57 65
  Quintile range 13–41 41–48 48–54 54–60 60–89
  Model 1 0·0008
   HR 1·0 (ref) 0·75 0·74 0·79 0·60 0·84
   95 % CI 0·59, 0·95 0·59, 0·94 0·63, 0·98 0·46 0·79 0·77, 0·92
  Model 2§ 0·20
   HR 1·0 (ref) 0·78 0·82 0·97 0·77 0·92
   95 % CI 0·60, 1·03 0·63, 1·07 0·74, 1·26 0·57,1·03 0·84, 1·01
PDQS (scoring approach 1)
Quintile median 10 14 16 17 21
Quintile range 5–11 12–14 15–16 17–18 19–29
  Model 1 <0·0001
   HR 1·0 (ref) 0·90 0·87 0·66 0·53 0·81
   95 % CI 0·70, 1·16 0·65, 1·16 0·49, 0·88 0·42 0·68 0·75, 0·88
  Model 2§ 0·01
   HR 1·0 (ref) 1·02 1·07 0·86 0·75 0·91
   95 % CI 0·79, 1·32 0·79, 1·45 0·63, 1·19 0·57,0·99 0·83, 1·00
PDQS (scoring approach 2)
  Quintile median 10 13 15 17 21
  Quintile range 5–12 12–14 14–16 16–18·5 19–30
  Model 1 <0·0001
   HR 1·0 (ref) 0·79 0·78 0·66 0·51 0·81
   95 % CI 0·58, 1·06 0·61, 0·99 0·50, 0·87 0·39, 0·67 0·74, 0·88
  Model 2§ 0·03
   HR 1·0 (ref) 0·83 0·93 0·82 0·70 0·91
   95 % CI 0·60, 1·14 0·70, 1·22 0·61, 1·12 0·51, 0·96 0·83, 1·00

PDQS, Prime Diet Quality Score; N 5525, events = 767.

*

Proportional hazards models used to estimate HR and 95 % CI; higher scores indicate greater dietary quality; HEI-2015: Health Eating Index-2015.

Standardised to probit scores (1-sd).

Models adjusted for age (continuous), sex and race/ethnicity.

§

Models adjusted for age (continuous), sex, race/ethnicity, day of week (weekend v. weekday), smoking status (nonsmoker, past and current), alcohol use (nondrinker, 2–4 drinks/week, 5–10 drinks/week, 11–18 drinks/week or 19+ drinks/week), physical activity (low, medium and high), BMI (<25, 25–29.9, 30–34.9, 35 and above).

‘Healthy’ components: ‘0’ =no foods from component eaten during both days, ‘1’ = foods consumed on one day, ‘2’ foods consumed on both days. ‘Unhealthy’ components were reversely coded. Minimum quantities used as cut-offs.

Daily gram ranges identified using data from several countries, assigning 0, 1 or 2 points for each component (negative components reversely scored).