Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 30;2023(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6

Feldman 2016.

Study characteristics
Methods Prospective cluster‐RCT. Ships from a single, central naval base. Ships were stratified by vessel classes (corvette, fast missile boat, and patrol boat).
Participants All people participating in security operations, routine exercises, and patrol at a single, central naval base were eligible.
The actual number of participants in the groups is not reported.
Interventions Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) dispensers in addition to soap‐and‐water hand‐washing versus soap‐and‐water hand‐washing. See Table 4 for details.
Outcomes Laboratory: bacterial palm cultures from 30 sailors from each group using a modified bag broth technique with sterile brain‐heart broth, at 0 and 4 months (sample participants)
Effectiveness:
Primary outcome: incidence of infectious diseases reported by the computerised patient records system using ICD‐9 diagnoses and grouped into diarrhoeal, respiratory, and skin infections; the number of sick call visits; and the number of sick leave and light‐duty days incurred by the sailors
Secondary outcome: subclinical morbidity (i.e. symptoms of self‐reported infectious diseases)
Safety: not reported
Notes No report on adherence
Study was conducted between May and September 2014 (4 months follow‐up).
CHG availability onboard the ships did not reduce the transmission of infectious diseases or colonisation.
Government funded (Israeli Defense Force Medical Corps).
Potential conflicts of interest: none disclosed.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No description of randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No description of allocation
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Unblinded. Self‐reported outcomes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No information if personnel collecting data for ICD‐9 diagnosis were blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No participants flow chart, no attrition data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol to compare