Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 30;2023(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6

Zomer 2015.

Study characteristics
Methods Cluster‐RCT
Participants 71 daycare centres (36 intervention DCCs, and 35 control) in Rotterdam‐Rijnmond, Gouda and Leiden in the Netherlands
Study enrolled 545 children (intervention = 278, control = 267).
Inclusion/exclusion criteria: children who attended the DCC at least 2 days a week; were aged between 6 months and 3.5 years at start of the trial; intended to attend the DCC throughout the study period; and if their parents consented, were Dutch‐speaking, and had access to email or regular post. Children were excluded if they had a chronic illness or medication that predisposed them to infection, a sibling taking part in the trial (i.e. 1 child per family could be included), or if they started attending CCC after the beginning of the trial).
Interventions 4 components:
  1. HH products, paper towel dispensers, soap, alcohol‐based hand sanitiser, and hand cream were provided for 6 months.

  2. Training and a booklet outlining the training.

  3. 2 team training sessions aimed at specific HH improvement activities.

  4. Posters and stickers for caregivers and children as reminders.


See Table 4 for details.
Outcomes Laboratory: none
Effectiveness: incidence of respiratory infections in children monitored by parents. The common cold was defined as a blocked or runny nose with at least 1 of the following symptoms: coughing, sneezing, fever, sore throat, or earache.
Safety: none planned or reported by the investigators
Notes The period study conducted: September 2011 to April 2012   
Funding: mixed. The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). Dispensers and refills were sponsored by SCA Hygiene Products, Sweden.
Declaration of interest: none.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Stratified randomization is performed by assigning each DCC to one of six strata based on size (i.e. small < 46 children per day versus large ≥ 46 children per day) and geographic location (i.e. highly urban versus urban versus slightly/non‐urban). DCCs are assigned to either intervention or control group by means of computer generation with a 1:1 ratio in each of the strata"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Outcome is subjective.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Symptoms were reported by parents, no validation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Very few children were excluded or lost to follow‐up (reasons for exclusions provided).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All planned outcomes are reported. However, between published protocol and the paper, secondary outcomes became the primary outcome in the published paper!

AEs: adverse events
AFH: Armed Forces Hospital
AGE: acute gastroenteritis
AgNPs: ARGOVIT silver nanoparticles
ALRI: acute lower respiratory infection
ARI: acute respiratory infection
ASR: adverse skin reactions
A&E: accident and emergency
BIPAP: bilevel positive airway pressure
CCC: childcare centre
CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CG: control group
CHG: chlorhexidine gluconate
CI: confidence interval
CMF: citric acid: malic acid: sodium lauryl sulphate (a virucidal mixture added to tissue paper)
CoV: coronavirus
cluster‐RCT: cluster‐randomised controlled trial
CRI: clinical respiratory illness
CXR: chest X‐ray
DCC: daycare centre
EG: experimental group
FRI: febrile respiratory illness
FU: follow up
GI: gastrointestinal
GTI: gastrointestinal infection
GP: general practitioner
HCW: healthcare worker
HFH: Hanoi French Hospital
HH: hand hygiene
HR: high risk
HSG: hand sanitiser group
ICD‐9: International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification
IgG: immunoglobulin G
ICU: intensive care unit
ILI: influenza‐like illness
IQR: interquartile range
IRR: incident rate ratio
ITT: intention‐to‐treat
KSA: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
LFD: lateral flow device
LNS: lipid based nutrient supplementation
LRTI: lower respiratory tract infection
LTCF: long‐term care facility
m: metre
MCU: medical convalescent unit
MDCK: Madin Darby canine kidney cell line
M group: face mask group
MH group: face mask and hand hygiene group
MS: monkey‐derived cell line
N/A: not applicable
NAT: nucleic acid testing
NH: nursing home
NICU: neonatal intensive care unit
NOS: Newcastle‐Ottawa Scales
NP: non‐pharmaceutical
NR: not reported
NTS: nasal and throat swab
OR: odds ratio
PCR: polymerase chain reaction
PCU: physical conditioning unit
POCT: point‐of‐care testing
PP: per protocol
PPE: personal protective equipment
QNAF: Qatar National Research Fund
RCT: randomised controlled trial
RDS: respiratory distress syndrome
RI: respiratory infection
RIDT: rapid influenza diagnostic test
RNA: ribonucleic acid
RR: risk ratio
rRT‐PCR: real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction
RTI: respiratory tract infection
RT‐PCR: reverse‐transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
RSV: respiratory syncytial virus
RV: rhinovirus
SAB: surfactant, allantoin, and benzalkonium chloride
SAR: secondary attack rate
SARS: severe acute respiratory syndrome
SCBU: special care baby unit
SD: standard deviation
SES: electrolysed water
SHEWA‐B: Sanitation, Hygiene Education and Water Supply in Bangladesh
SOB: shortness of breath
SOPs: standard operating procedures
S/S: signs/symptoms
SSTI: skin and soft‐tissue infection
STH: soil‐transmitted helminth
SWG: soap and water group
TIDieR: Template for Intervention Description and Replication
UHR‐I: ultra high‐risk infection
UHR‐S: ultra high‐risk SARS
URI: upper respiratory infection
URTI: upper respiratory tract infection
WBC: white blood cell
WHO: World Health Organization
WSH: water, sanitation, and handwashing (combined)