Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2018 Feb 3;14(2):1020–1032. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00756

Table 1:

Average relative error and average absolute error from the ensemble average polar solvation energy, ΔGpolarsolv, of that from the optimized crystal and energy minimized structures.

Minimization
Environment
Dielectric distribution model
TRAD-1 GAUSS-1 GAUSS-2 GAUSS-4 GAUSS-8
Crystal Structure * 5.59% a (90.90) b 19.34% (338.14) 10.35% (180.00) 5.31% (94.06) 18.09% (312.99)
In Vacuo 15.26% (262.13) 10.55% (179.48) 5.13% (85.01) 11.52% (206.69) 25.76% (449.86)
GBIS 5.14 % (85.71) 24.82 % (432.90) 14.41% (248.53) 5.16% (92.97) 14.50% (250.07)
Explicit Water (TIP3P) 6.21% (101.12) 20.07% (348.26) 10.16% (174.61) 5.30% (92.72) 18.18% (315.74)
*

After optimizing the added hydrogens while restraining the heavy atoms in the crystal structure with a force constant of 1e6 KJ mol−1nm−2.

a

Mean relative unsigned error

b

In the parentheses, average absolute error (in kcal mol−1).