Table 3.
Baseline variables retained in elastic net models predicting control condition outcome
| Emotion-Focused Rumination |
Problem-Focused Rumination |
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Predictors | Coefficient | Coefficient |
|
| ||
| Age | −0.03 | |
| Gender | 0.06 | |
| CDI | −0.008 | −0.04 |
| MASC | −0.10 | −0.01 |
| ERQ Suppression | −0.04 | |
| ERQ Reappraisal | 0.007 | |
| CRSQ Rumination | −0.02 | |
| CRSQ Distraction | 0.05 | |
| CRSQ Problem Solving | 0.04 | |
| FFMQ Observe | 0.003 | |
| FFMQ Describe | −0.005 | |
| FFMQ Nonjudgement | 0.08 | 0.003 |
| FFMQ Nonreactivity | −0.006 | |
| FFMQ Awareness | 0.10 | 0.04 |
| PSWQ-C | −0.01 | |
Note. ERQ = Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; CRSQ = Children’s Response Styles Questionnaire; FFMQ = Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire; CDI = Children’s Depression Inventory; MASC = Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children; PSWQ = Penn State Worry Questionnaire child version. Emotion-focused rumination model: alpha = 0.25, lambda = 0.48; Problem-focused rumination model: alpha = 0, lambda = 2. Positive parameter estimates indicate that higher scores on the predictor variable are associated with better outcome (i.e., reduction in state rumination).