Abstract
In this case, we present a lesser-known application of regional anesthesia, specifically, managing a patient with vasospasm and retained radial artery (RA) vascular sheath after coronary angiography. Providing an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block, in combination with general anesthesia, allowed the proceduralist to remove the retained sheath after several hours of failed treatment and manipulation. Severe arterial spasm was alleviated by eliciting a sympathectomy, along with analgesia of the right upper extremity, and maintaining this post-procedure. The block optimized arterial flow through the RA post-intervention and helped manage the patients’ pain from manipulation.
Keywords: ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, coronary artery angiography, upper extremity sympathectomy, retained radial artery sheath, supraclavicular brachial plexus block
Introduction
Radial artery (RA) spasm is a known side effect of manipulation of the vessel, for example during catheterization and harvesting. As a result, systemic and local vasodilators (including calcium channel blockers, nitroglycerine, and papaverine) are administered [1].
Upper extremity sympathectomy from brachial plexus block has been shown to reduce vasospasm of the RA, and the block's utility in other vascular procedures (e.g. creation of arterio-venous fistulas) has also been noted. A pre-emptive sympathectomy prevents vasospasm intraoperatively, and this protective effect continues into the immediate postoperative period [2-5]. We present a case of severe RA vasospasm after the percutaneous cardiac intervention, causing undesired retention of the intra-arterial sheath. The sheath was removed under a supraclavicular, ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block and general anesthesia (GA).
Case presentation
A 78-year-old Caucasian female with a past medical history of diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, prior cerebral vascular accident, hypothyroidism, and coronary artery disease presented to the emergency department complaining of a “funny feeling in her head,” visual changes, and lightheadedness. She had no focal neurological deficits and denied any loss of consciousness. She was compliant with a medication regimen consisting of aspirin, proton pump inhibitor, statin, hydrochlorothiazide, thyroid hormone replacement, beta-blocker, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. Vital signs were within normal limits, she was in no acute distress, and the physical exam was without remarkable findings. Initial lab work revealed normal cardiac enzymes, hemoglobin level, and white cell count. A cardiac work-up two months prior revealed severe left circumflex disease, an ejection fraction of 75%, and a small area of possible ischemia in the mid and anterolateral ventricular wall. The patient was diagnosed with angina unresponsive to medical treatment and was scheduled for coronary angiography.
The patient was medicated with 1 mg of midazolam and 1 mg of hydromorphone intravenously. The right RA was selected for access following a modified Allen's test and doppler ultrasound interrogation. A 6 French Hydrorophilic Transradial sheath 0.018 (Vascular Solutions, Minneapolis, MN) was inserted without difficulty. Through the sheath, 3 mg of verapamil and 3000 units of heparin were given. Because of difficulty directing a 5 Fr JR 3.5 catheter to the right coronary artery, along with patient complaints of pain on catheter manipulation, the short sheath was removed over a wire. A 6 Fr x 65 cm destination sheath was then inserted to facilitate procedural manipulation and reduce irritation. An additional 3 mg of verapamil was given intra-arterial before re-insertion of the sheath.
The patient continued to complain of brachial and forearm pain and was treated with topical nitroglycerin to the forearm area, treating presumptive spasms. Additional midazolam and hydromorphone were also given.
On completion of the procedure, there was significant resistance when trying to remove the long radial sheath; meanwhile, the patient complained of excruciating pain as this was attempted (Figure 1).
Lidocaine, verapamil, and nitroprusside were unsuccessfully administered through the sheath in an attempt to induce local vasodilation. The patient was transferred to the CCU (coronary care unit) on heparin infusion, topical nitroglycerin to the brachial area, and intravenous analgesia, with the intent of awaiting the resolution of the vasospasm. Warm compresses were applied, and no further systemic vasodilators were given since the procedural team was concerned about the patient becoming hypotensive. No features of distal cyanosis were visible.
After four hours, removal of the radial sheath was still not possible with gentle traction in the CCU and the anesthesiology department was consulted to assist in management. Our recommendation was to attempt the removal of the sheath under the brachial plexus block. The patient was brought to the pre-op holding area and a supraclavicular nerve block was placed. The skin of the right supraclavicular area was prepped with betadine and draped with sterile towels. Using ultrasound guidance with a General Electric Logic-e portable ultrasound machine with a 12L linear array probe (GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI) the subclavian artery and the brachial plexus were identified, as well as the pleura and the first rib. A two-inch 22g block needle (Braun Stimuplex, Bethlehem, PA) was advanced under direct visualization to the vicinity of the brachial plexus, and, after negative aspiration, 20cc of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected slowly, obtaining good spread around the nerves (Figure 2).
The patient was then taken to the operating room, while simultaneously she stated that her pain was resolving. Proceeding with attempted removal under mild sedation was considered, but, at the cardiology team’s request, GA was induced, due to uncertainty about how the intra-operative course would play out. The patient was induced using intravenous medications (lidocaine 50 mg, propofol 150 mg, and midazolam 2 mg) and a #4 laryngeal mask airway was easily placed. Sevoflurane was used to maintain anesthesia, and no narcotics were given. Angiography was again performed, now demonstrating resolution of the spasmodic segment, with excellent flow through the artery. The long sheath was removed with minimal resistance and the RA integrity was maintained with no retaining products. The patient was taken to the recovery room stable and in no pain, with a good palpable right radial pulse (Figure 3).
Discussion
The RA is a spastic, highly reactive vessel due to its physiological, anatomical, and embryological characteristics. It is a type 3 vessel based on He’s classification [6]. Its pharmacologically induced contractility is more pronounced than other arterial conduits. Mechanical manipulation readily induces spasms, which can lead to A-V fistula construction failure as well as early graft failure after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) [7]. The RA is a “temperamental” vessel, which, as a result of this nature, has been debated as a proper conduit in CABG surgery. Though all arterial conduits display equal endothelial function, the RA has more pronounced angiotensin II and endothelin 1 induced contractility than the internal mammary artery (IMA) [8]. The RA is an alpha-adrenoreceptor dominant artery (mostly Alpha 1 subtype) and is therefore extraordinarily sensitive to phenylephrine infusion during cardiac surgery [9,10].
Several interventions have been suggested to reduce the RA's tendency to spasm, namely nitroglycerin, calcium channel blockers, and phentolamine (oral or intravenous), but their use is controversial, and their efficacy has been equivocal [11-13]. In this particular case, it was markedly difficult to retrieve the long catheter from the RA because of arterial spasm and pain, which underscores the proclivity of and magnitude with which this artery can contract. In this case, nitroglycerin and phentolamine were given both systemically and locally, yet were ineffective.
An ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block was eventually performed, with the goal of creating an upper extremity sympathectomy [14]. GA was also induced, though we felt that the catheter could have been removed under regional anesthesia alone. Because this had been a significant, concerning problem for a period of hours, the cardiology team did not want to wait for the block to be fully set up and asked us to provide GA urgently. The team was also unsure what would happen to the patient on the second attempt at removal. Regardless, it is well known that GA produces vasodilatation, which was likely beneficial in this case. Having a brachial plexus block in place alleviated concerns about hand ischemia due to post-surgical manipulation or post-emergence spasm since the vasodilatory effects of GA disappear on emergence, but the regional sympathectomy due to upper extremity nerve block lasts for a period of hours. Ultimately, the catheter was easily removed, and continuous blood flow to the hand was present after emergence from GA, with a normal capillary refill, easily palpable pulses, and normal hand color.
Although retention of a radial sheath is uncommon, it has been described after angiographic procedures [15,16]. Complications from retained RA catheters have been reported to include persistent bleeding, cannulation site infection, and granuloma [17-19]. A technique to consider when putting large bore, and/or lengthy catheters into the RA, with the possibility of multiple exchanges or cannulation attempts, is to perform regional anesthesia, either alone, or in combination with GA, in order to ensure continuous vasodilation either during or after the procedure. Peripheral nerve blocks causing bleeding complications such as hematoma formation are rare in patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant medication [20]. Regional anesthesia should also be considered as a rescue technique for a retained catheter due to vasospasm.
Conclusions
We present a case and subsequent treatment of a retained vascular sheath in the RA of a patient undergoing cardiac catheterization to assess coronary artery function. A technique to consider when placing large bore, and/or lengthy catheters into the RA, with the possibility of multiple exchanges or cannulation attempts, is to perform regional anesthesia, either alone or in combination with GA, in order to ensure continuous vasodilation during and after the procedure.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Intra-arterial vasodilators to prevent radial artery spasm: a systematic review and pooled analysis of clinical studies. Kwok CS, Rashid M, Fraser D, Nolan J, Mamas M. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16:484–490. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pre-emptive stellate ganglion block increases the patency of radial artery grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery. Yildirim V, Akay HT, Bingol H, et al. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:434–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sympathectomy-mediated vasodilatation: a randomized concentration ranging study of epidural bupivacaine. Ginosar Y, Weiniger CF, Kurz V, Babchenko A, Nitzan M, Davidson E. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:213–221. doi: 10.1007/s12630-008-9036-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Regional anesthesia: sympathectomy-mediated vasodilation. Backman SB. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:702–703. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9138-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Regional anesthesia for vascular access surgery. Malinzak EB, Gan TJ. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:976–980. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181adc208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting: biological characteristics, functional classification, and clinical choice. He GW. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 ;67:277–284. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01207-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Characteristics of adrenoreceptors in the human radial artery: clinical implications. He GW, Yang CQ. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:1136–1141. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70414-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Radial artery has higher receptor-mediated contractility but similar endothelial function compared with mammary artery. He GW, Yang CQ. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1346–1352. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00106-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Radial artery angiographic string sign: clinical consequences and the role of pharmacologic therapy. Miwa S, Desai N, Koyama T, Chan E, Cohen EA, Fremes SE. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:112–118. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.The role of vessel wall physiology in predicting coronary bypass graft patency. Singh SK, Fremes SE. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;1:5. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-1-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Response of the radial artery to three vasodilatory agents. Abe S, Meguro T, Endoh N, et al. Catheter.Cardiovasc.Interv. 2000;49:253–256. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200003)49:3<253::aid-ccd5>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Facilitation of radial artery cannulation by periradial subcutaneous administration of nitroglycerin. Candemir B, Kumbasar D, Turhan S, et al. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:1151–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Assessment of the efficacy of phentolamine to prevent radial artery spasm during cardiac catheterization procedures: a randomized study comparing phentolamine vs. verapamil. Ruiz-Salmerón RJ, Mora R, Masotti M, Betriu A. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;66:192–198. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.The effects of interscalene brachial plexus block on humeral arterial blood flow: a Doppler ultrasound study. Iskandar H, Wakim N, Benard A, Manaud B, Ruel-Raymond J, Cochard G, Huber C. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:279-81, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154188.15821.E9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Management of radial artery spasm. Abhaichand RK. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;62:281–282. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Entrapment of a transradial angiogram catheter because of severe vasospasm. Kallivalappil SC, Pullani AJ, Abraham B, Kumar MK, Ashraf SM. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;22:428–430. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.A retained catheter in the radial artery. Kumar A. J Perioper Pract. 2015;25:39. doi: 10.1177/175045891502500302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Infected chronic sinus secondary to a retained fragment of radial artery introducer sheath following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) Ghazala CG, Marrow BA, Kearney D, Harrison JWK. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12:0. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sterile radial artery granuloma after transradial procedures: a unique and avoidable complication. Zellner C, Ports TA, Yeghiazarians Y, Boyle AJ. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:673–676. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bleeding complications following peripheral regional anaesthesia in patients treated with anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents: A systematic review. Joubert F, Gillois P, Bouaziz H, Marret E, Iohom G, Albaladejo P. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019;38:507–516. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]