Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31:1–30. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1057/s41267-022-00592-w

Table 1.

Data structure

First-order codes Theoretical categories Aggregate dimensions
Rejection of announcement/closure and employees disengage with MNE Break in cooperative behavior Impact on knowledge transfer
Statements that conveyed conviction that something needed to happen quickly to re-engage staff
Descriptions that conveyed how staff were willing to engage with knowledge transfer activities Reinstated cooperative behavior
Statements that indicated objective of protecting and preserving company and staff interests
Anger, frustration, discontent, shock Emotional barriers Emotions
Mistrust, betrayal
Sad, upset
Pride Emotional enablers
Trust, sense of purpose
Counselling Engaging with emotions Subsidiary leadership practices
Reassuring
Training and professional development Reconfiguring incentives
Additional financial incentives
Reflection, inflection, and establishing a new narrative Sensegiving for subsidiary identity
Local leaders emphasizing tradition of site delivery
Informal one-to-ones and group sessions to reinforce sense of “we’re all in it together”
Established subsidiary identity based on historical performance Disruption to subsidiary identity Subsidiary identity dynamics
Discontinuity in subsidiary identity (due to closure announcement)
Some continuity in subsidiary identity Legacy subsidiary identity
Task-focused, narrower subsidiary identity