Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 30;14(1):70. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05607-4

Fig. 2. The regulation of SCDEs on M1/M2 polarization in LPS-stimulated BMDMs.

Fig. 2

A Representative images of iNOS (red) and F4/80 (green). Nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bar: 20 μm. B Representative western blots showing the reduction of iNOS. C The image analysis results were presented as the relative mean intensity of the fluorescence of iNOS (n = 5). D Quantitative analysis of the iNOS/GAPDH ratio (n = 3). E Representative images of CD206 (red) and F4/80 (green). Nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue) in each group (n = 5). Scale bar: 20 μm. F Representative western blots showing the increase of CD206. G The image analysis results were presented as the relative mean intensity of the fluorescence of CD206 (n = 5). H Quantitative analysis of the CD206/GAPDH ratio (n = 3). IJ Flow cytometry assay detected CD86 + M1 phenotype, indicating that SCDEs treatment suppressed the M1 polarization in LPS-stimulated BMDMs (n = 3). K, L Flow cytometry assay detected CD206 + M2 phenotype, showing that SCDEs treatment promoted the M2 polarization in LPS-stimulated BMDMs (n = 3). Data were presented as mean ± SEM. Results were analyzed by One-way ANOVA. Significance: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.