Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 6;107(2):201–206. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319618

Table 1.

The importance of 18 features in two methods

Permutation importance Impurity-based feature importance
Feature Importance Feature Importance
ICL size 1.00 ICL size 1.00
ACD 0.64 ACD 0.52
Pupil size 0.51 Type of ICL 0.29
ACA 0.47 The time after surgery 0.19
CT 0.45 Pupil size 0.16
AL 0.44 WTW 0.14
The time after surgery 0.40 AL 0.11
K2 value 0.31 CT 0.09
K2 axis 0.31 ACA 0.08
K1 value 0.31 K2 value 0.07
K1 axis 0.28 Sphere 0.07
WTW 0.27 K1 value 0.06
Sphere 0.26 Sphere of ICL 0.04
Sphere of ICL 0.18 K2 axis 0.04
SE of ICL 0.17 SE of ICL 0.02
Type of ICL 0.13 K1 axis 0.02
Cylinder 0.08 Cylinder 0.01
Cylinder of ICL 0.08 Cylinder of ICL 0.0

The highest importance aligned to 1.0 and scale the left values accordingly.

ACA, anterior chamber angle; ACD, anterior chamber depth; AL, axial length; CT, corneal thickness; ICL, implantable collamer lens; K1, steepest meridian keratometry; K2, flattest meridian keratometry; SE, spherical equivalent; WTW, white to white.