Table 3.
Participant engagement and retention strategies.
Intervention type, reference | Participants, n | Intervention | Dropouta, n (%) | Reported reasons to drop out | Financial or material support | Access to the technology | ||||
|
|
Duration | Follow-up |
|
|
|
|
|||
Smartphone | ||||||||||
|
Thompson et al [42], 2020 | 60 | 28 days | N/Ab | 20 (33) | 16 discharged; 1 incarcerated; 1 hospitalized; 1 self-withdrew; 1 relocated | US $25 to US $50 gift cards+smartphone or US $100 gift card | Researchers provided the smartphones | ||
|
Schueller et al [19], 2019 | 35 | 1 month | N/A | 15 (43) | Unclearc | Phone service and data | Researchers provided the smartphones | ||
|
Glover et al [40], 2019 | 100 | 6 months | N/A | 81 (81) | Unclear | Smartphone+US $5 gift card | Researchers provided the smartphones | ||
|
Sheoran et al [41], 2016 | 6 | One time | N/A | N/A | N/A | US $100 gift card | Researchers provided the smartphones. A total of 83% (5/6) participants already owned a smartphone | ||
|
Chao et al [36], 2017 | 24 | 1 month | N/A | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Researchers provided the smartphones | ||
|
Karnik et al [46], 2017 | 20 | Unclear | Unclear | N/A | N/A | Unclear | Researchers provided the smartphones | ||
|
Leonard et al [43], 2018 | 49 | Variable (6-8 months) | N/A | 9 (18) | 4 discharged; 4 technology problem; 1 did not use the ICTd | US $90 stipend | Researchers provided the smartphones | ||
|
Linnemayr et al [38], 2021e | 77 | 6 weeks | 3 months | 11 (14) | Unclear | US $65 | Participants’ phone | ||
|
Tucker et al [39], 2020e | 28f | 1 week | N/A | 2 (20)f | Unclear | Unclear | Participants’ phone | ||
Other ICTs | ||||||||||
|
Medalia et al [45], 2017 | 91 | 26 weeks | 1 month | 69 (76) | Baseline to week 26: 25 loss of interest; 14 moved; 17 scheduling conflict; 7 discharged; 4 withdrawn; 2 legal issues | Reimbursed for public transportation cost | Researchers provided the computers | ||
|
Chavez et al [44], 2020 | 30 | One time | 1-3 days | 1 (3) | 1 did not return | US $50 | Researchers provided the headset | ||
|
Archie et al [47], 2018 | 55 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear |
aPercentage of dropouts: participants who were assessed at baseline and were lost to follow-up.
bN/A: not applicable.
cUnclear: authors did not provide sufficient or any information.
dICT: information and communication technology.
fThe sample that was analyzed in Tucker et al [39] was included and analyzed in Linnemayr et al [38]. Dropout percentage was calculated from the 10 participants who were included in the intervention, the rest (18 participants) participated in focus groups and were not counted for dropout proportions.