Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;11:17. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01452-3

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Effect of butyrate on Mel improved memory impairment in sleep-deprived mice. A Schematic illustration of experimental design. B Track plot of spatial memory test (with hidden platform). C Latency to reach the platform (n = 8). D Path length to reach the platform (n = 8). E Path efficiency to reach the platform (n = 8). F Track plot of spatial memory test (without hidden platform). G Number of entries into the target zone (n = 8). H Time spent in the target zone (n = 8). I Images of the immunohistochemical microglia in the different experimental groups. The immunohistochemical results were processed using ImageJ. Bar = 50 μm. J–L IOD of Iba1-positive cells in the hippocampal cornu ammonis (CA)1, CA3, and dentate gyrus (DG) regions (n = 6). M–P The levels of cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-4, and IL-10) in the hippocampus (n = 5). Q–T Relative protein levels of HDAC3, p-IκB, p-P65, and cleaved caspase-3 in the hippocampus (n = 6). CON: control group, SD: sleep deprivation group, SD + Mel: SD + melatonin (20 mg/kg) group, SD + Abs: SD + antibiotics group, SD + Abs + Mel: SD + antibiotics + Mel group, SD + Abs + Butyrate: SD + antibiotics + Butyrate (40 mM) group. The data represent the mean ± SEM, p < 0.05 was set as the threshold for significance by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc comparisons using Tukey’s test for multiple groups’ comparisons, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001