Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Surg Educ. 2022 Oct 4;80(1):102–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.08.018

Table 3.

Difference in themes of entry by gender and specialtya

Theme, by gender b Men (N=52) Women (N=31) Total (N=83) P value
Lack of professionalism
 Any 42 (81) 29 (94) 71 (86) .11
 Delay 23 (44) 16 (52) 39 (47) .52
 Attitude 21 (40) 10 (32) 31 (37) .46
 Lack of communication 11 (21) 17 (55) 28 (34) .002
Perceived medical error 25 (48) 7 (23) 32 (39) .02
Breach in institutional protocol 12 (23) 7 (23) 19 (23) .96
Theme, by specialty c Medical specialty (N=36) specialtySurgical specialty (N=40) Total (N=76) P value
Lack of professionalism
 Any 27 (75) 37 (93) 64 (84) .04
 Delay 14 (39) 25 (63) 39 (51) .04
 Attitude 13 (36) 12 (30) 25 (33) .57
 Lack of communication 15 (42) 10 (25) 25 (33) .12
Perceived medical error 17 (47) 13 (33) 30 (40) .19
Breach in institutional protocol 4 (11) 15 (38) 19 (25) .008
Theme, women only d Medical specialty (N=16) Surgical specialty (N=12) Total (N=28) P value
Lack of professionalism
 Any 14 (88) 12 (100) 26 (93) .20
 Delay 8 (50) 8 (67) 16 (57) .28
 Attitude 6 (38) 2 (17) 8 (29) .23
 Lack of communication 10 (63) 5 (42) 15 (54) .27
Perceived medical error 5 (31) 2 (17) 7 (25) .38
Breach in institutional protocol 2 (13) 5 (42) 7 (25) .08
a

Themes are not mutually exclusive

b

Entries with no identifiable gender excluded (n=124)

c

Entries with no identifiable specialty excluded (n=7)

d

Entries with identified gender and specialty only