Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 3;78(1):87–96. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac157

Table 4.

Hierarchical Multiple Regression Results for Social Frailty Predicting Each Well-Being Indicator

Apathy Demoralization Social anxiety Resilience Satisfaction with life
β 95% CI for β sr 2 β 95% CI for β sr 2 β 95% CI for β sr 2 β 95% CI for β sr 2 β 95% CI for β sr 2
Step 1 F(3, 86) = 4.44, p = .006
R2 = .13, adjusted R2 = .10
F(3, 86) = 21.45, p < .001
R2 = .43, adjusted R2 = .41
F(3, 86) = 4.49, p = .003
R2 = .15, adjusted R2 = .12
F(3, 86) = 8.12, p < .001
R2 = .22, adjusted R2 = .19
F(3, 86) = 8.52, p < .001
R2 = .23, adjusted R2 = .20
Physical frailty −0.19 −0.40, 0.03 .030 −0.10 −0.27, 0.08 .008 −0.13 −0.35, 0.08 .015 0.09 −0.11, 0.30 .008 0.14 −0.07, 0.34 .016
Cognitive frailty 0.10 −0.13, 0.33 .008 0.33*** 0.14, 0.52 .082 0.09 −0.14, 0.32 .006 −0.24* −0.46, −0.03 .045 −0.33** −0.55, −0.11 .082
Depression 0.34** 0.10, 0.57 .083 0.47*** 0.28, 0.66 .159 0.37** 0.13, 0.60 .097 −0.34** −0.56, −0.44 .082 −0.27* −0.49, −0.05 .053
Step 2 F(4, 85) = 4.13, p = .004
R2 = .16, adjusted R2 = .12
F(4, 85) = 23.45, p < .001
R2 = .52, adjusted R2 = .50
F(4, 85) = 4.57, p = .002
R2 = .18, adjusted R2 = .14
F(4, 85) = 8.58, p < .001
R2 = .29, adjusted R2 = .25
F(4, 85) = 15.76, p < .001
R2 = .43, adjusted R2 = .40
Physical frailty −0.15 −0.37, 0.07 .018 −0.03 −0.19, 0.14 .001 −0.10 −0.31, 0.12 .007 0.03 −0.17, 0.24 .001 0.04 −0.15, 0.22 .001
Cognitive frailty 0.12 −0.11, 0.35 .011 0.36*** 0.19, 0.53 .099 0.11 −0.12, 0.34 .009 0.27* −0.48, −0.06 .056 −0.38*** −0.57, −0.19 .107
Depression 0.27* 0.03, 0.51 .048 0.35*** 0.16, 0.53 .080 0.30* 0.06, 0.54 .060 0.24* −0.46, −0.01 .036 −0.10 −0.30, 0.10 .007
Social frailty 0.18 −0.03, 0.39 .028 0.33*** 0.17, 0.49 .097 0.18 −0.03, 0.39 .029 0.27** −0.47, −0.08 .067 −0.47*** −0.64, −0.30 .196

Notes: CI = confidence interval, sr2 = squared semipartial correlation coefficient.

N = 90. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.