Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 22;54(1):1089–1111. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2064541

Table 1.

Main clinical trials dedicated on the assessment of anti-VEGF molecules in diabetic retinopathy. The order of appearance follows the year of publication.

N Title Acronym Design Number of Patients Max duration Drug Year of publication Main conclusions Reference
1 Two-year outcomes of the ranibizumab for edoema of the mAcula in diabetes (READ-2) study READ-2 Prospective, randomized, interventional, multicenter clinical trial 126 24 months Ranibizumab 2010 Ranibizumab is effective in DME management with or without laser 77
2 Safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in diabetic macular edoema (RESOLVE Study): a 12-month, randomized, controlled, double-masked, multicenter phase II study RESOLVE Randomized, controlled, double-masked, multicenter phase II study 151 12 months Ranibizumab 2010 Ranibizumab is effective in DME management 78
3 The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edoema RESTORE Randomized, double-masked, multicenter, laser-controlled phase III study 345 12 months Ranibizumab 2011 Ranibizumab with or without laser is superior to laser monotherapy for DME management 79
4 Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edoema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE RISE and RIDE Two parallel, methodologically identical, phase III, multicenter, double-masked, sham injection-controlled, randomized studies 377 (RISE) and 382 (RIDE) 24 months Ranibizumab 2012 Ranibizumab is effective in DME management 80
5 Randomized clinical trial evaluating intravitreal ranibizumab or saline for vitreous haemorrhage from proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Protocol N Phase 3, double-masked, randomized, multicenter clinical trial 261 4 months Ranibizumab 2013 Ranibizumab is useful in vitrectomy setting of PDR 122
6 A randomized trial to assess functional and structural effects of ranibizumab versus laser in diabetic macular edoema (the LUCIDATE study). LUCIDATE Prospective, randomized, single-masked clinical trial 33 12 months Ranibizumab 2014 Ranibizumab is effective in DME management 81
7 The REVEAL Study: Ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy in Asian patients with diabetic macular edoema. REVEAL Randomized, double-masked, multicenter, laser-controlled, phase III study 396 12 months Ranibizumab 2015 Ranibizumab with or without laser is superior to laser monotherapy for DME management 82
8 Ranibizumab 0.5 mg for diabetic macular edoema with bimonthly monitoring after a phase of initial treatment: 18-month, multicenter, phase IIIB RELIGHT Study. RELIGHT Phase IIIb, prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm study 109 18 months Ranibizumab 2015 Ranibizumab is effective in DME management 83
9 Panretinal photocoagulation vs intravitreous Ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized clinical trial Protocol S Randomized, multicenter, clinical trial 394 Up to five years Ranibizumab 2015-2018 Ranibizumab not inferior to PRP for PDR management 86,87
10 Intravitreal Aflibercept for diabetic macular edoema: 100-week results from the VISTA and VIVID studies. VISTA and VIVID Two similarly designed, double-masked, randomized, phase 3 trials, VISTA(DME) and VIVID(DME) 872 24 months Aflibercept 2015 Aflibercept is effective in DME management 99,100
11 A study of Abicipar Pegol in patients with diabetic macular edoema (NCT02186119). N/A Randomized, multicenter study 151 12 months Abicipar pegol 2015 Abicipar pegol non-inferior to ranibizumab for DME management N/A
12 Ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-and-extend regimen for diabetic macular oedema: the RETAIN study. RETAIN Single-masked, randomized study 372 24 months Ranibizumab 2016 Ranibizumab is effective in DME management 84
13 Twenty-four-month outcomes of the Ranibizumab for edoema of the macula in diabetes – protocol 3 with high dose (READ-3) Study READ-3 Randomized, controlled, double-masked (to the dose), interventional, multicenter clinical trial 152 24 months Ranibizumab 2016 Ranibizumab is effective in DME management 85
14 Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edoema Protocol T Randomized, multicenter, clinical trial 660 24 months Aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab 2016 Aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab non-inferiority study 88
15 Ranibizumab 0.3 mg for persistent diabetic macular edoema after recent, frequent, and chronic Bevacizumab: The ROTATE Trial. ROTATE Open-label, prospective study 30 12 months Ranibizumab and bevacizumab 2016 Ranibizumab demonstrated improved outcome in patients with persistent DME following bevacizumab 93
16 Outcomes with as-needed Aflibercept and macular laser following the Phase III VISTA DME Trial: ENDURANCE 12-month extension study. ENDURANCE Phase IV, multicenter, open-label extension study (12-month extension of VISTA and VIVID) 60 36 months Aflibercept 2017 Aflibercept with or without laser is superior to laser monotherapy for DME management 101
17 Clinical efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 52 weeks (CLARITY): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, controlled, phase 2 b, non-inferiority trial. CLARITY Phase 2 b, single-blind, non-inferiority trial 232 12 months Aflibercept 2017 Aflibercept is more effective than PRP for PDR management 123
18 Visual acuity outcomes in diabetic macular edoema with Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.2 μg/day versus Ranibizumab plus deferred laser (DRCR Protocol I). Protocol I Randomized, multicenter study 188 36 months Ranibizumab and Fluocinolone Acetonide 2018 Fluocinolone Acetonide was comparable to ranibizumab plus deferred laser for DME management 89
19 The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema. RELATION Double-masked, multicentre phase IIIb study 128 12 months Ranibizumab 2018 Ranibizumab with or without laser is superior to laser monotherapy for DME management 94
20 Ranibizumab plus panretinal photocoagulation versus panretinal photocoagulation alone for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PROTEUS Study). PROTEUS Prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II/III study 87 12 months Ranibizumab 2018 Ranibizumab plus PRP superior to PRP monotherapy for DME management 124
21 Ranibizumab plus panretinal photocoagulation versus panretinal photocoagulation alone for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PROTEUS Study). PROTEUS Prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II/III study 87 12 months Ranibizumab 2018 Ranibizumab plus laser superior than laser alone for PDR management 124
22 Efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in Chinese patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edoema: results from the 12-month REFINE study. REFINE Phase III, double-masked, multicenter, laser-controlled study 384 12 months Ranibizumab 2019 Ranibizumab with or without laser is superior to laser monotherapy for DME management 95
23 Effect of initial management with Aflibercept vs laser photocoagulation vs observation on vision loss among patients with diabetic macular edoema involving the centre of the macula and good visual acuity: a randomized clinical trial. Protocol V Randomized, multicenter study 702 24 months Aflibercept 2019 Aflibercept is more effective than laser for DME management 102
24 Simultaneous inhibition of angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A with Faricimab in diabetic macular edoema: BOULEVARD Phase 2 randomized trial. BOULEVARD Prospective, randomized, active comparator-controlled, double-masked, multicenter, phase 2 study 229 6 months Faricimab 2019 Faricimab was statistically superior than ranibizumab for DME management 120
25 Real-world outcomes following 12 months of intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy in patients with diabetic macular edoema in France: results from the APOLLON study. APOLLON Prospective, observational cohort study 147 12 months Aflibercept 2020 Aflibercept is effective in DME management 125
26 A randomized, double-masked, multicenter, Phase III Study assessing the efficacy and safety of Brolucizumab versus Aflibercept in patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edoema (KITE). KITE and KESTREL Ongoing prospective, randomized, phase III clinical studies 361 (KITE) and 561 (KESTREL) 24 months Brolucizumab and aflibercept 2020 Brolucizumab non-inferior to aflibercept for DME management 115
27 Long-term outcomes of treat-and-extend ranibizumab with and without navigated laser for diabetic macular oedema: TREX-DME 3-year results TREX-DME Multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial 116 36 months Ranibizumab 2021 Ranibizumab is effective in DME management 90–92
28 Evaluation of intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy: results from the PANORAMA randomized clinical trial. PANORAMA Double-masked, multicenter, randomized clinical trial 402 24 months Aflibercept 2021 Aflibercept is effective in DME management 126
29 Effect of intravitreous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor vs sham treatment for prevention of vision-threatening complications of diabetic retinopathy: the protocol W randomized clinical trial. Protocol W Randomized, multicenter study 328 24 months Aflibercept 2021 Aflibercept is associated with lower progression to PDR than sham 103
30 Intravitreal conbercept for diabetic macular oedema: 2-year results from a randomized controlled trial and open-label extension study. SAILING Multicentre, randomized, double-masked, double-sham, parallel controlled, phase III trial (Sailing Study), followed by a 12-month open-label extension study 251/157 12 + 12 months Conbercept 2021 Conbercept is more effective than laser for DME management 106
31 Effect of Aflibercept on diabetic retinopathy severity and visual function in the RECOVERY Study for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. RECOVERY Prospective, longitudinal, multicenter clinical trial 40 12 months Aflibercept 2021 Aflibercept is associated with improvement of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale for PDR eyes 127
32 A multi centre, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, comparative clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MYL-1701P and Eylea® in subjects with diabetic macular edoema N/A Multi Centre, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, comparative clinical study 355 12 months MYL-1701P and aflibercept N/A Ongoing 121
33 A Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Faricimab (RO6867461) in patients with diabetic macular edoema (RHINE) RHINE Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled study 951 24 months Faricimab and aflibercept N/A Ongoing 121
34 A Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Faricimab (RO6867461) in patients with diabetic macular edoema (YOSEMITE) YOSEMITE Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled study 940 24 months Faricimab and aflibercept N/A Ongoing 121