Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;2023(1):CD005562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub3

Bottino 2005.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants N = 13 (9F/4M)
'Mildly impaired probable Alzheimer’s diagnosis'
All participants taking rivastigmine 6‐12 mg/day for 2 months
Mean MMSE 22.3 (SD 3.6; range 16‐28)
Age 73.7 (range 62‐83)
Outpatients
Interventions 'cognitive rehabilitation' plus rivastigmine; carers attended a support group at same time (N = 6)
Treatment‐as‐usual: rivastigmine plus 30 minute monthly consultation with doctor in relation to medication (N = 7)
Outcomes Participants:
Cognition: MMSE; ADAS‐Cog, plus battery of neuropsychological tests
ADL (rated by carer)
Carers' mood: Hamilton Anxiety and Montgomery‐Asberg Depression Rating Scales
Notes 90 minutes, once a week, for 5 months
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised blocks design
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Random allocation to either group by telephone made by an assessor blind to the patient group
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Assessment made by assessors blinded to group allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Zero attrition reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Scores for all measures reported
Other bias ‐ training and supervision Unclear risk No information provided on therapists
Other bias ‐ treatment manual Unclear risk Some detail given of 'cognitive rehabilitation training sessions', meeting criteria for cognitive stimulation, but no mention of manual or protocol