Breuil 1994.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | N = 61 (37F/24M) Diagnosis of dementia (DSM‐III) (90% have Alzheimer's disease) Age 77.1 (range 61‐93) Mean MMSE 21.5 (range 9‐29) Outpatients |
|
Interventions | Cognitive stimulation (N = 29) Treatment‐as‐usual (N = 27) |
|
Outcomes | Cognition: MMSE, CERAD ADL: ECA scale rated by family members |
|
Notes | 60 minutes, 2 times a week, for 5 weeks | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as randomised, but no details of randomisation reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details of randomisation reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Cognitive assessments made by an assessor blind to group allocation; ADL assessment open |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Five patients excluded as did not attend all training and evaluation sessions (3 from treatment group, 2 from controls) ‐ reasons for non‐attendance not provided |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Data on all measures reported, except for several scales which were deemed unsuitable due to ceiling effects |
Other bias ‐ training and supervision | Unclear risk | Two therapists ‐ psychologist and physician ‐ training in cognitive stimulation techniques not specified |
Other bias ‐ treatment manual | Unclear risk | Described as a 'cognitive stimulation programme' and some examples given, but no information regarding a manual or protocol |