Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;2023(1):CD005562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub3

Coen 2011.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants N = 27 (14F/13M)
Dementia ‐ MMSE 10‐23
MMSE: 16.9 (SD 5.0)
Age: 79.8 (SD 5.6)
Groups ran in 2 long‐term care facilities and a private nursing home
Interventions Cognitive stimulation (N = 14)
No treatment (N = 13)
Outcomes Cognition: MMSE; ADAS‐Cog
Quality of life: QoL‐AD
Mood: Geriatric Depression Scale (14‐item); RAID (Rating of Anxiety in Dementia)
Behaviour: Behaviour Rating Scale (CAPE)
Clinical Dementia Rating (sum of boxes)
Notes 45 minutes, 2 times a week for 7 weeks
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Stated that participants were randomly assigned. Author confirmed computerised randomisation and random number tables were used.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear who carried out randomisation and whether this was independent
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Tests administered by staff blind to group membership
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No attrition reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Data for all measures reported
Other bias ‐ training and supervision Unclear risk Sessions led by occupational therapists and activity coordinator ‐ training/supervision unclear
Other bias ‐ treatment manual Low risk Used Spector 2006 manual