Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;2023(1):CD005562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub3

Onder 2005.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants N = 156 (113F/43M)
Probable Alzheimer's Disease, on donepezil for at least 3 months
MMSE 20.1 (SD 3.1)
Age 75.8 (SD 7.1)
Living at home
Interventions Individual RO (delivered by family caregiver) + donepezil (N = 79)
Donepezil only (N = 77)
Outcomes Cognition: MMSE; ADAS‐Cog
ADL: Barthel; Lawton & Brody IADL scale
Behaviour problems: NPI
Family caregiver outcomes: Hamilton anxiety and depression scales; Caregiver Burden Inventory; SF‐36
Notes 30 minutes, 3 times a week, for 25 weeks; plus informal contacts 2 or 3 times a day
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computerised block randomisation process
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information regarding the independence of the randomisation process
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Assessments made by blind assessors
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Attrition data reported with reasons: 9 from RO group, 10 from control group i.e. 12%. Intention‐to‐treat analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Data for all outcome measures reported
Other bias ‐ training and supervision Low risk Family caregivers trained by a multidisciplinary team including physicians, psychologists and therapists. Training included a simulated therapy session.
Other bias ‐ treatment manual Low risk The family caregivers were also provided with a manual of instruction on the therapy and specific schedules for each session.