Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;2023(1):CD005562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub3

Orrell 2014.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants N = 236 (150 F/86 M)
Dementia according to DSM‐IV criteria (31% Alzheimer's disease)
32% receiving AChEI medication
Mean MMSE 17.8 (SD 5.5)
Age 83.1 (SD; 7.6)
Nine care homes and nine community settings
Interventions Maintenance cognitive stimulation groups (following 7 weeks of twice‐weekly cognitive stimulation groups) (N = 123)
Treatment‐as‐usual controls (following 7 weeks of twice‐weekly cognitive stimulation groups) (N = 113)
Outcomes Cognition: ADAS‐Cog; MMSE
Quality of life: QoL‐AD (self‐report and proxy); DEMQOL
Mood: Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia; RAID
ADL: ADCS‐ADL scale
Behaviour problems: NPI
Caregiver outcomes: SF‐12
Notes 45 minutes, once a week, for 24 weeks
No data were imputed for those cases in which all assessments were missing (see page 30, SHIELD report). Adjusted means used for meta‐analysis
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "The random allocation sequence was computer‐generated and in the ratio of 1:1." Carried out by clinical trials unit
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Only intervention researcher informed of allocation by clinical trials unit
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Blinded researchers completed interviews and questionnaires. Proxy measures completed by carers/care staff not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Attrittion rates and reasons given, analysis by treatment allocated
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Results given for all planned outcomes
Other bias ‐ training and supervision Low risk "All facilitators had at least 1 year of experience in dementia care, and had attended the 1‐day CST training course."
Other bias ‐ treatment manual Low risk Published treatment manual