Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;2023(1):CD005562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub3

Spector 2001.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants N = 35
Diagnosis of dementia according to DSM‐IV criteria
MMSE 13.1 (SD 4.4)
Age 85.7 (SD 6.7)
Living at home: 12; living in residential home: 23
Interventions Cognitive stimulation (N = 21)
Treatment‐as‐usual (N = 14)
Outcomes Cognition: MMSE; ADAS‐Cog
Communication: Holden Communication Scale
Mood: Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia; RAID
Behaviour: Behaviour Rating Scale (CAPE).
Family caregivers: Relatives Stress Scale; GHQ
Notes 45 minutes, 2 times a week, for 7 weeks
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomly allocated to either group by drawing names from a sealed container
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomly allocated to either group by drawing names from a sealed container ‐ would have been preferable for randomisation to have been carried out independently
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk At least some of the assessments were carried out by staff aware of group allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Attrition reported (with reasons): 4 in CS group, 4 in control group i.e. 23%
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Data from all measures reported
Other bias ‐ training and supervision Unclear risk Groups led by a member of the research team, with a member of staff as co‐facilitator ‐ training and supervision unclear
Other bias ‐ treatment manual Low risk Manual (Spector 2006) developed through this study