Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;2023(1):CD005562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub3

Tanaka 2021.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants N = 31 (18F/13M)
'Dementia' ‐ MMSE 5‐25
4/31 receiving donepezil
MMSE: 15.5 (SD 5.8)
Age: 86.2 (SD 7.8)
Geriatric health service facility (inpatient)
Interventions Group exercise and cognitive stimulation (N = 16)
Treatment‐as‐usual (N = 15)
Outcomes Cognition: MMSE
Quality of life: QoL‐D (short version, proxy completed)
Social interaction: nurses’ observation scale of geriatric patients (NOSGER) sub‐item ‘social behaviour’
Apathy scale
ADL: Barthel Index
Behaviour problems: Dementia Behavior Disturbance Scale
Notes 45 minutes, 2 times a week, for 8 weeks
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No detail of how randomisation was carried out
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information as to who carried out the randomisation or whether an external person was involved
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Although observational ratings made by staff not involved in the intervention, not clear whether assessors were blinded or not
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk 33% of participants in control group dropped out (compared with 6% in intervention group) ‐ unclear what effect this may have had on results
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Results reported for all outcomes mentioned in Methods section
Other bias ‐ training and supervision Unclear risk Although staff had at least 5 years experience of group interventions in this context, arrangements for specific training/supervision in the intervention used here not described
Other bias ‐ treatment manual Unclear risk Although the Japanese version of the CST manual was referenced, the current study appears to include additional components.