Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;2023(1):CD005562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Alves 2014 No separate data for people with dementia (MCI)
Apostolo 2013 No data for people with dementia
Apostolo 2014 No data for people with dementia
Arcoverde 2008 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation. Diagnoses varied, not purely dementia
Baglio 2015 Multi‐component intervention
Baines 1987 Unclear diagnostic criteria: "moderate‐to‐severe impairment of cognitive function"
Basak 2008 Intervention described did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation; better fit for cognitive training
Brook 1975 Did not not include a measure of cognitive function
Buettner 2011 Included both people with dementia and with MCI ‐ results not given separately
Calatayud 2022 No data provided for people with dementia (MCI)
Camargo 2015 Intervention allocation not randomised
Camargo 2019 Intervention allocation not randomised
Carlson 2008 Intervention described did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation but for cognitive training. Diagnoses varied, not purely dementia
Cassinello 2008 Did not report an RCT
Cheng 2006 Intervention described did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation
Constantinidou 2008 Intervention described did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation
Croisile 2006 Did not report results from an RCT
Davis 2001 Cognitive stimulation (delivered for 30 minutes a day, 6 days a week by family caregivers) confounded with cognitive training‐spaced retrieval and face name associations
Devita 2021 Intervention allocation not randomised
Eckroth‐Bucher 2009 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation. Diagnoses varied, not purely dementia
Eggermont 2009a Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation
Eggermont 2009b Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation
Evans 2009 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation
Faggian 2007 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation
Fanto 2002 No mention of randomisation; available only as a conference abstract
Farina 2006a Non‐randomised allocation; comparison was with an active treatment group.
Farina 2006b Non‐randomised allocation; comparison was with an active treatment group.
Fernandez‐Calvo 2010 In Spanish ‐ only the abstract was in English
Ferrario 1991 Unclear diagnostic criteria: "Elderly patients with cognitive disturbances"
Folkerts 2018 No data for people with a dementia diagnosis
Gerber 1991 Eligible study, but no extractable data provided. Only data available were for a composite cognitive and behavioural scale.
Goldstein 1982 Around 25% of participants appeared not to have dementia; other diagnoses included schizophrenia, epilepsy and ruptured aneurysm.
Gonzalez‐Abraldes 2010 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation
Green 2009 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation
Greenaway 2008 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation
Han 2017 No separate data for people with dementia (MCI)
Hanley 1981 Eligible study, but no extractable data available
Hill 2014 Study sample was people with dementia AND superimposed delirium.
Holden 1978 Diagnoses varied, not purely dementia. Not clear that participants were randomised to the intervention and control groups
Johnson 1981 Allocation of patients to treatment was not random for various practical reasons.
Justo‐Henriques 2019 No data for people with dementia (MCI)
Kim 2015 No data for people with dementia (MCI)
Kim 2020 Intervention did not not meet definition of cognitive stimulation.
Kolanowski 2016 Delirium superimposed on dementia
Liu 2021 Allocation to intervention and control not random
Luttenberger 2019 Data not available for people with dementia ‐ included MCI
Matsuda 2007 Non‐randomised study
McCormick 2019 No cognitive outcome measure
Menna 2016 Intervention allocation not randomised
Meza‐Kubo 2009 Not a randomised control trial
Milev 2008 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation ‐ related to 'snoezelen'.
Mudge 2008 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation.
Muniz 2015 No data for people with dementia ‐ combined with MCI
Newson 2006 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation. Diagnoses varied, not dementia
Niu 2010 Intervention met criteria for cognitive training rather than cognitive stimulation.
Okamura 2018 Not cognitive stimulation ‐ described cognitive training
Olazaran 2004 12/84 participants with diagnoses of MCI; results not presented separately for those with Alzheimer's disease. Interventions included additional elements as physical exercise.
Oliveira 2021 Did not meet definition of cognitive stimulation
Onieva‐Zafra 2018 Intervention allocation not randomised
Orrell 2005 Allocation to intervention and control groups not random for maintenance study
Perkins 2022 Intervention allocation not randomised
Piras 2017 Comparison was with alternate treatment.
Quayhagen 1995 Although intervention was described as cognitive stimulation, it appeared to focus on specific cognitive modalities, and so fits better with cognitive training definition.
Quayhagen 2000 Although intervention was described as cognitive stimulation, it appeared to focus on specific cognitive modalities, and so fits better with cognitive training definition.
Raggi 2007 Not an RCT
Reeve 1985 No indication of random allocation to groups
Riegler 1980 Comparison of RO plus music versus RO. No control groups without RO
Rueda 2021 Comparison was with alternative treatment.
Ruiz Sanchez de Leon 2007 Not an RCT and intervention did not meet the criteria for inclusion under cognitive stimulation.
Schecker 2013 Intervention did not meet inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation.
Schmitter‐Edgecombe 2008 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation.
Scott 2003 Did not report on a study intervention. No RCT
Silva 2017 Not cognitive stimulation
Silva 2021 No data for people with dementia (MCI)
Skov 2022 No control group
Smith 2009 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation.
Tadaka 2004 The intervention combined elements of Reality Orientation (RO) and reminiscence. The RO element appeared to be only an orientation board, used to reinforce orientation for time, place and person. The reminiscence element appears to be predominant, with a variety of reminiscence‐based triggers, and so the study would be a better fit for a review of reminiscence work with people with dementia.
Tanaka 2017 Multi‐component intervention
Tarraga 2006 Allocation to groups was not entirely random. For the comparison of interest, integrated psychostimulation programme versus medication only control, allocation was clearly non‐random.
Thickpenny‐Davis 2007 Intervention did not meet the inclusion criteria for cognitive stimulation; participants included with other diagnosis than dementia
Tsai 2008 Not RCT
Tsai 2019 Intervention allocation not randomised
Van Zon 2016 Intervention allocation not randomised
Wallis 1983 Unclear diagnostic criteria: "Demented/organic"
Wenisch 2007 Participants included with MCI, not dementia
Wettstein 2004 Did not report an intervention study
Williams 1987 Not an RCT; compared two wards; not cognitive stimulation; involved environmental modification and informal RO
Woods 1979 Unclear diagnostic criteria: "Significant memory impairment"
Yamanaka 2013 Intervention allocation not randomised
Young 2020 No data for people diagnosed with dementia
Zanetti 1995 Allocation non‐randomised
Zepelin 1981 Not an RCT; compared residents at one home with those in another
Zientz 2007 Did not report an intervention study

MCI: mild cognitive impairment

RCT: randomised controlled trial

RO: reality orientation