Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 1;15(2):460–470. doi: 10.1111/os.13603

TABLE 5.

Estimated PROMs and 95% confidence intervals at T1 and T6 for subjects with on‐target rKA and on‐target MA based on GEE models that adjusted for demographic characteristics and clinical measures

On‐target rKA On‐target MA Z Value P‐value
Estimated change in KOOS12 from baseline
T1 26.053 (23.658, 28.448) 18.607 (15.691, 21.523) 3.90 < 0.001
T6 51.017 (48.567, 53.467) 46.896 (44.187, 49.605) 2.28 0.023
Estimated change in EQ5D from baseline
T1 0.457 (0.424, 0.490) 0.367 (0.334, 0.400) 4.27 < 0.001
T6 0.606 (0.581, 0.631) 0.565 (0.538, 0.592) 2.58 0.010
Estimated FJS
T1 54.126 (48.932, 59.320) 40.965 (33.750, 48.180) 3.06 0.002
T6 66.256 (60.809, 71.703) 59.581 (52.486, 66.676) 1.64 0.102