Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Dec 23;75(2):232–241. doi: 10.1002/art.42333

Table 4.

Logistic regression assessing for association of TNFi use and elevated laboratory values

Laboratory variables (cut-off values) Number of observations Odds ratio (95% CI) p-value AIC BIC
NLR (3.669) 779 0.172 (0.100–0.295) <0.001 465.386 502.650
PLR (242.466) 727 0.073 (0.024–0.219) <0.001 168.163 204.874
ESR (22.000 mm/Hr) 724 0.319 (0.221–0.463) <0.001 803.004 839.682
CRP (1.980 mg/dL) 688 0.407 (0.268–0.618) <0.001 636.908 673.178
NLR (+ ESR) 672 0.159 (0.085–0.299) <0.001 373.007 413.599
NLR (+ CRP) 602 0.197 (0.107–0.359) <0.001 373.807 413.409
PLR (+ ESR) 263 0.059 (0.015–0.237) <0.001 128.216 156.793
PLR (+ CRP) 146 0.084 (0.024–0.296) <0.001 120.333 144.202

Controlled for race, age, disease duration, Charlson Comorbidity index, alcohol use, marital status.

The final models (+ ESR and + CRP) tested for associations of PLR and sacroiliitis after included either ESR or CRP in the model.

TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; CI, confidence interval; AIC, Akaike Information Criteria; BIC, Bayesian Information Criteria; mm/Hr, millimeters per hour; mg/dL, milligrams per deciliter