Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2022 Dec 5;89(4):1617–1633. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29547

Table 2.

Performance measures for T1 mapping analysis of the raw data. Paired values in parentheses in each field correspond to the (NRMSE, CCC).

R=8
Subject L1 LR CD CD+r (μ = 0.10)
S1 (0.204, 0.921) (0.207, 0.916) (0.201,0.928) (0.202,0.926)
S2 (0.201, 0.918) (0.206, 0.912) (0.204,0.920) (0.194, 0.928)
S3 (0.193, 0.918) (0.201, 0.910) (0.185, 0.928) (0.186, 0.928)
R=12
Subject L1 LR CD CD+r (μ = 0.10)
S1 (0.243, 0.883) (0.246, 0.878) (0.219,0.914) (0.235,0.897)
S2 (0.248, 0.869) (0.249, 0.867) (0.220,0.907) (0.224,0.900)
S3 (0. 230, 0.879) (0. 234, 0.874) (0.211, 0.906) (0.211, 0.905)
R=18
Subject L1 LR CD CD+r (μ = 0.10)
S1 (0.0.287, 0.830) (0.0.288, 0.827) (0.254,0.883) (0.283,0.840)
S2 (0.290, 0.813) (0.293, 0.807) (0.249,0.876) (0.255,0.868)
S3 (0.265, 0.837) (0.271, 0.828) (0.235,0.880) (0.229, 0.889)
R=36
Subject L1 LR CD CD+r (μ = 0.10)
S1 (0.364, 0.703) (0.374, 0.682) (0.315, 0.811) (0.434, 0.633)
S2 (0.38, 0.624) (0.408, 0.575) (0.301, 0.813) (0.417, 0.648)
S3 (0.329, 0.739) (0.332, 0.730) (0.280, 0.822) (0.277, 0.821)