Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 1;24:5. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00687-6

Table 2.

Reasons for revision of the three pairs of cohorts were represented as incidence, percentage, and distribution of failures

Reasons for revision Apta
(1984)
Apta-fix
(629)
Hydra
(1671)
Hydra-fix
(691)
Recta
(662)
Recta-fix
(152)
N Incidence (%) Frequency of failure (%) N Incidence (%) Frequency of failure (%) N Incidence (%) Frequency of failure (%) N Incidence (%) Frequency of failure (%) N Incidence (%) Frequency of failure (%) N Incidence (%) Frequency of failure (%)
Pain without loosening 0 0 0 1 0.2 7.1 3 0.2 10.7 0 0 0 3 0.5 17.6 0 0 0
Periprosthetic fracture 5 0.3 18.5 5 0.8 35.7 7 0.4 25 3 0.4 25 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dislocation 8 0.4 29.6 0 0 0 2 0.1 7.1 1 0.1 8.3 3 0.5 17.6 1 0.7 20
Cup aseptic loosening 3 0.2 11.1 1 0.2 7.1 2 0.1 7.1 0 0 0 3 0.5 17.6 0 0 0
Global aseptic loosening 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.7 20
Stem aseptic loosening 1 0.1 3.7 1 0.2 7.1 3 0.2 10.7 1 0.1 8.3 1 0.2 5.9 0 0 0
Infection 2 0.1 7.4 1 0.2 7.1 2 0.1 7.1 1 0.1 8.3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unknown 1 0.1 3.7 1 0.2 7.1 4 0.2 14.3 1 0.1 8.3 1 0.2 5.9 1 0.7 20
Ossifications 2 0.1 7.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 5.9 0 0 0
Primary instability 2 0.1 7.4 1 0.2 7.1 1 0.1 3.6 2 0.3 16.7 3 0.5 17.6 0 0 0
Neck breakage 2 0.1 7.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 5.9 0 0 0
Liner breakage 1 0.1 3.7 0 0 0 3 0.2 10.7 1 0.1 8.3 0 0 0 1 0.7 20
Stem breakage 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.1 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.7 20
Total 27 1.4 100 14 2.2 100 28 1.7 100 12 1.7 100 17 2.6 100 5 3.3 100