Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 18;25:e40725. doi: 10.2196/40725

Table 3.

General Linear Model analysis results for Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ) team and cross-boundary continuity (TCC) baseline-to-second follow-up change score.

Model term Coefficient 95% CI P value
Treatment

Intercept 1.1 −0.9 to 3.1 .26

Group (intervention vs control) 0.1 −0.4 to 0.6 .66

Cancer type (breast vs prostate) −0.2 −0.7 to 0.4 .59

Age (continuous) 0 0 to 0 .52

Total comorbid conditions (continuous) 0 −0.1 to 0.1 .55

Baseline NCQ TCC −0.6 −1.1 to −0.2 .01

Baseline NCQ PC1a 0.1 −0.2 to 0.4 .41

Baseline NCQ PC2b 0.3 0 to 0.7 .07

Intervention × cancer type (interaction) 0.3 −0.5 to 1.1 .49
Survivorship

Intercept 2.2 0.5 to 4 .01

Group (intervention vs control) 0 −0.3 to 0.3 .89

Sex (female vs male) −1 −1.8 to −0.2 .02

Cancer type (breast vs colorectal) 0.5 −0.1 to 1.2 .13

Age (continuous) 0 0 to 0.1 .21

Total comorbid conditions (continuous) 0.1 0 to 0.1 .14

Baseline NCQ TCC −0.6 −0.9 to −0.3 <.001

Baseline NCQ PC1 0 −0.2 to 0.2 .87

Baseline NCQ PC2 0.2 −0.1 to 0.4 .20

aPC1: personal continuity relating to the PCP.

bPC2: personal continuity relating to the cancer specialist.