Table 3.
General Linear Model analysis results for Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ) team and cross-boundary continuity (TCC) baseline-to-second follow-up change score.
| Model term | Coefficient | 95% CI | P value | ||||
| Treatment | |||||||
|
|
Intercept | 1.1 | −0.9 to 3.1 | .26 | |||
|
|
Group (intervention vs control) | 0.1 | −0.4 to 0.6 | .66 | |||
|
|
Cancer type (breast vs prostate) | −0.2 | −0.7 to 0.4 | .59 | |||
|
|
Age (continuous) | 0 | 0 to 0 | .52 | |||
|
|
Total comorbid conditions (continuous) | 0 | −0.1 to 0.1 | .55 | |||
|
|
Baseline NCQ TCC | −0.6 | −1.1 to −0.2 | .01 | |||
|
|
Baseline NCQ PC1a | 0.1 | −0.2 to 0.4 | .41 | |||
|
|
Baseline NCQ PC2b | 0.3 | 0 to 0.7 | .07 | |||
|
|
Intervention × cancer type (interaction) | 0.3 | −0.5 to 1.1 | .49 | |||
| Survivorship | |||||||
|
|
Intercept | 2.2 | 0.5 to 4 | .01 | |||
|
|
Group (intervention vs control) | 0 | −0.3 to 0.3 | .89 | |||
|
|
Sex (female vs male) | −1 | −1.8 to −0.2 | .02 | |||
|
|
Cancer type (breast vs colorectal) | 0.5 | −0.1 to 1.2 | .13 | |||
|
|
Age (continuous) | 0 | 0 to 0.1 | .21 | |||
|
|
Total comorbid conditions (continuous) | 0.1 | 0 to 0.1 | .14 | |||
|
|
Baseline NCQ TCC | −0.6 | −0.9 to −0.3 | <.001 | |||
|
|
Baseline NCQ PC1 | 0 | −0.2 to 0.2 | .87 | |||
|
|
Baseline NCQ PC2 | 0.2 | −0.1 to 0.4 | .20 | |||
aPC1: personal continuity relating to the PCP.
bPC2: personal continuity relating to the cancer specialist.