Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 19;13:1050822. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1050822

Table 2.

Motor nerve conduction test measurements.

Normal intact rats 91 days after nerve graft
Animal groups Right side Left side Operated side
(right)
Control side
(left)
Amplitude of compound muscle action potential [mV]
Run–idle 16.3 ± 3.6 17.2 ± 5.0 11.9 ± 4.9 (73%) 18.8 ± 7.9
Run–run 17.3 ± 4.2 17.3 ± 5.2 6.3 ± 3.4 (37%) 18.7 ± 7.8
Idle–idle 12.1 ± 3.3 13.6 ± 2.5 6.5 ± 2.2 (54%) 19.3 ± 5.6
Idle–run 18.9 ± 3.9 20.1 ± 3.9 8.1 ± 2.0 (43%) 18.0 ± 7.2
Latency of compound muscle action potential [ms]
Run–idle 2.3 ± 0.7 2.1 ± 0.4 3.1 ± 0.7 (134%) 2.4 ± 0.6
Run–run 2.6 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.6 (124%) 2.4 ± 0.7
Idle–idle 2.7 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.5 3.2 ± 0.6 (117%) 2.1 ± 0.5
Idle–run 2.4 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.5 3.1 ± 0.4 (134%) 2.0 ± 0.3

CMAP amplitude and latency of the soleus muscle were measured in the same rats immediately before the transection of the sciatic nerve and again 91 days after the nerve graft (mean ± SD, n = 8 rats/group). Data in brackets are the percent of the preoperative value.