Table 3.
AOFAS, VAS Scores, and Satisfaction Rate at Last Follow-up.
| AOFAS Score | VAS Score | Satisfaction Rate, % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Pre | Post | P Value | Pre | Post | P Value | |
| Burg et al3 | 41.6 | 86.1 | <.01 | NR | NR | 100 | |
| Holme et al14 | 48.2 | 93.4 | <.01 | NR | NR | 100 | |
| Chan et al4 | 59 | 93.7 | .001 | 5.1 | 0 | .001 | NR |
| Liszka and Gądek21 | 41 | 89.5 | NR | NR | NR | NR | |
| de Carvalho et al5 | 43.9 | 92.6 | <.01 | 8.24 | 1.19 | .01 | NR |
| Díaz Fernández6 | 45.8 | 91.2 | <.0001 | NR | NR | NR | |
| Tay et al35 | 54.3 | 83.3 | <.001 | 5.5 | 1.1 | <.001 | 86 MIS vs 73 open |
| Brogan et al2 | NR (MOXFQ 46.6) | NR (MOXFQ 13) | <.001 | NR | NR | NR | |
| Jowett and Bedi16 | 56 | 87 | <.001 | NR | NR | 87 | |
| Mikhail et al27 | NR (FFI 48 and 44) | NR (FFI 18 and 25) | <.001 | NR | NR | 91.60 | |
| Lai et al20 | 58.6 | 87.4 | <.05 | 4 | 0.7 | <.05 | 82.8 MIS vs 81 open |
| Frigg et al9 | 52 | 95 | NR | 3 | 0 | NR | NR |
| Nunes et al29 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | |
| Ghioldi et al10 | 65.3 | 89.9 | NR | 5.2 | 1.1 | NR | NR |
| Kurashige17 | NR (JSSF 65.3) | NR (JSSF 97.9) | <.0001 | 3.9 | 1.1 | <.0001 | NR |
| Marijuschkin et al24 | 49.2 | 88.6 | <.05 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| Lucas y Hernandez et al23 | 62.5 | 97.1 | 1.32 × 10−27 | NR | NR | NR | 97 |
Abbreviations: AOFAS, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society; FFI, Foot Function Index; JSSF, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot Scale; MIS, minimally invasive surgery; MOXFQ, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire; NR, not reported; Post, postintervention; Pre, preintervention; VAS, visual analog scale.