Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 18;13:1097228. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1097228

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis on the association between DII and hypertension in the sensitivity analysis.

Non-adjusted model Model I Model II
OR [95% CI] p value OR [95% CI] p value OR [95% CI] p value
DII 1.03 [1.00, 1.05] 0.05* 1.07 [1.05, 1.10] <0.001*** 1.05 [1.03, 1.08] <0.001***
Q1 Reference Reference Reference
Q2 1.03 [0.90, 1.18] 0.62 1.10 [0.95, 1.27] 0.21 1.07 [0.92, 1.23] <0.39
Q3 1.14 [1.00, 1.29] 0.05* 1.33 [1.16, 1.52] <0.001*** 1.25 [1.09, 1.44] 0.002**
Q4 1.10 [0.97, 1.26] 0.15 1.37 [1.19, 1.58] <0.001*** 1.26 [1.10, 1.45] 0.001**

Data are presented as OR [95% CI]. Model I adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Model II adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education levels, smoking, alcohol users, diabetes, eGFR, and BMI.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; DII, Dietary Inflammatory Index; Q1, first quartile; Q2, second quartile; Q3, third quartile; Q4, fourth quartile. –, not applicable.

*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.