Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 2;23:68. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02731-7

Table 3.

Comparative assessment of emilateral palatal linear measurements recorded in the treated group (TG) and control group (CG)

eICW Mean diff p value* p value** p value** eIMW Mean diff p value* p value** p value**
TG T0 CBS 11.67 (± 1.32) 0.86 (± 0.15) p < 0.05 p < 0.05 p < 0.05 T0 CBS 13.53 (± 1.19) 1.54 (± 0.21) p < 0.05 p < 0.05 p < 0.05
nCBS 12.53 (± 1.28) nCBS 15.07 (± 1.22)
T1 CBS 12.98 (± 1.40) 0.44 (± 0.16) NS T1 CBS 15.15 (± 1.27) 0.88 (± 0.19) p < 0.05
nCBS 13.42 (± 1.37) nCBS 16.03 (± 1.28)
CG T0 CBS 13.01 (± 1.21) 0.99 (± 0.10) p < 0.05 NS T0 CBS 14.06 (± 1.41) 1.50 (± 0.15) p < 0.05 NS
nCBS 12.02 (± 1.24) nCBS 15.56 (± 1.46)
T1 CBS 12.96 (± 1.35) 0.98 (± 0.10) p < 0.05 T1 CBS 13.95 (± 1.51) 1.54 (± 0.14) p < 0.05
nCBS 11.97 (± 1.39) nCBS 15.49 (± 1.50)

eICW, distance between mild palate plane and the centre of dento-gingival junctions of primary canine; eIMW, distance between mild palate plane and the centre of dento-gingival junctions of first molar; CBS, cross-bite side; nCBS, non cross-bite side

*P values based on Independent Student’ t test for intra-timing side-to-side measurements and set at p < 0.05

**P values based on paired Student’ t test for inter-timing mean differences and set at p < 0.05; NS, non significant

***P values based on Independent Student’ t test for inter-groups comparison of the mean of differences and set at p < 0.05