Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 15;83(3):386–397. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-1641

Table 2.

Association results of leading SNPs in overall HNSCC, OPC, and non-OPC in MVP Discovery and MDAC Validation Cohort.

Discovery Validation Meta-analysis
Genic locationa MAF Logistic regressionb Logistic regressionb Logistic regressionb
Chr. loci* Gene rs ID# Tissue-specific eQTL Case Control OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Overall HNSCC in NHWs
5q35.1 FGF18 rs67585403 intergenic 0.23 0.24 0.90 (0.86–0.94) 4.6 × 10−5 0.99 (0.89–1.10) 0.7658 0.95 (0.84–1.05) 0.0098
6p21.32 *h*c HLA-DRB5 rs111834747 promoter 0.37 0.29 1.35 (1.22–1.50) 5.5 × 10−7 1.19 (1.11–1.27) 2.5 × 10−7 1.28 (1.12–1.47) 2.6 × 10−9
HLA-DRB1 rs28724008 intron 0.37 0.30 1.23 (1.13–1.33) 1.3 × 10−6 1.15 (1.08–1.23) 5.2 × 10−5 1.19 (1.06–1.32) 7.4 × 10−8
HLA-DQB1 rs6928482 downstream, eQTL−l-s 0.32 0.29 1.24 (1.13–1.35) 2.2 × 10−6 1.24 (1.13–1.36) 4.5 × 10−6 1.24 (1.10–1.39) 2.2 × 10−8
9q31.1 SMC2 rs3818625 promoter, eQTL−s 0.43 0.44 0.92 (0.88–0.95) 4.1 × 10−5 0.91 (0.82–1.04) 0.1619 0.90 (0.82–1.02) 4.1 × 10−4
16q24.3 FANCA rs12931267 intron, eQTL−l-s 0.08 0.07 1.17 (1.09–1.30) 2.3 × 10−5 0.99 (0.83–1.11) 0.7512 1.14 (0.98–1.28) 0.0099
19p13.2 *c ICAM5 rs11575074 downstream 0.06 0.05 1.21 (1.10–1.31) 8.4 × 10−6 1.06 (0.95–1.18) 0.3757 1.16 (1.01–1.29) 0.0045
Overall HNSCC in African-Americans
6p21.32 *h*c HLA-G rs1130356 p.H117H, eQTL−l-s 0.23 0.28 0.70 (0.57–0.86) 4.8 × 10−4
9q21.33 GAS1 rs111548894 promoter 0.02 0.01 4.48 (2.03–9.89) 2.1 × 10−4
11q12.2 *h CD6 rs72928596 promoter 0.03 0.01 2.81 (1.59–4.97) 3.8 × 10−4
11q23.2 NCAM1/CD56 rs17510855 enhancer 0.01 0.00 4.99 (2.11–11.8) 2.6 × 10−4
17p13.1 CD68 rs9901673 p.Q254K, eQTL−s 0.14 0.19 0.61 (0.48–0.79) 1.1 × 10−4
18q22.2 *h*c SOCS6 rs11665533 promoter 0.54 0.49 1.36 (1.15–1.60) 3.6 × 10−4
OPC in all races/ethnicities
2p21 PRKCE rs2711286 intron 0.21 0.23 0.81 (0.72–0.91) 2.3 × 10−5 0.94 (0.83–1.07) 0.3489 0.83 (0.70–1.04) 0.0053
4q12 *c cKIT/CD117 rs2646357 3′ flanking 0.48 0.44 1.19 (1.08–1.30) 2.3 × 10−5 0.97 (0.89–1.07) 0.5762 1.11 (0.96–1.27) 0.0061
6p21.32 *h*c HLA-DRB5 rs111834747 promoter 0.37 0.29 1.35 (1.20–1.52) 3.7 × 10−7 1.33 (1.22–1.46) 3.3 × 10−10 1.35 (1.20–1.55) 9.7 × 10−11
HLA-DRB1 rs28724008 intron 0.38 0.30 1.38 (1.23–1.55) 3.4 × 10−8 1.35 (1.22–1.48) 9.8 × 10−10 1.37 (1.22–1.58) 2.8 × 10−11
· HLA-DQB1 rs3135006 intergenic, eQTL−l-s 0.09 0.12 0.70 (0.61–0.82) 2.9 × 10−8 0.71 (0.64–0.78) 4.6 × 10−11 0.70 (0.60–0.83) 5.1 × 10−12
Non-OPC in all races/ethnicities
1p36.32 *h*c TP73 rs1122723 intron 0.40 0.44 0.84 (0.76–0.92) 9.1 × 10−6 0.93 (0.83–1.03) 0.2061 0.86 (0.75–1.03) 0.0031
3p25.3 IRAK2 rs6442161 intron, eQTL−l-s 0.40 0.37 1.18 (1.08–1.29) 3.4 × 10−5 1.09 (0.97–1.21) 0.1092 1.15 (1.00–1.29) 0.0022
10q26 *h DMBT1 rs17103659 intergenic 0.12 0.16 0.81 (0.72–0.91) 4.8 × 10−5 0.81 (0.66–0.98) 0.0393 0.80 (0.64–0.98) 1.3 × 10−4
15q22.2 TPM1 rs72743223 intron 0.10 0.09 1.31 (1.13–1.52) 4.2 × 10−5 1.17 (1.00–1.36) 0.0534 1.26 (1.01–1.48) 2.0 × 10−4
16q24.3 FANCA rs12931267 intron, eQTL−l-s 0.08 0.07 1.21 (1.11–1.32) 1.2 × 10−5 1.10 (0.85–1.40) 0.4726 1.15 (0.98–1.39) 0.0062

Note: *, Known GWAS loci for HNSCC as *h; **, known loci for cervical cancer as *c.

Abbreviations: ID, RefSNP identification number; UTR, untranslated region; TSS, transcriptional start site.

aSNP functional regulatory features (transcriptional enhancer, promoter, transcriptional start site) were predicted by the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE). The eQTLs were retrieved from the GTEx catalog, based on RNA-seq analysis for normal lung (eQTL−l) and squamous esophagus (eQTL−s) tissues, which best represent oropharyngeal and oral cavity tissue.

bIn the discovery (MVP-HNSCC study), the regression models and P values were adjusted for age, sex, genetically Harmonized Ancestry and Race/Ethnicity (HARE), smoking status, alcohol abuse, and BMI category. In the validation (MDACC-HNSCC study), only age, sex, and the principal components (eigenvectors) were adjusted. Variants remaining significant (P meta ≤ 4.95 × 10−4) in the meta-analysis were bolded.