Table 2.
Summary and GRADE score for studies of system-level opioid prescribing guidelines
Study | Target | Study design | Intervention | Results | Bias | GRADE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Saunders et al. (2015)20 | Physicians in Group Health (GH), health plan in Washington State | Prospective cohort | Chronic opioid therapy guidelines instituted with training on opioid prescribing. Control group of in-network physicians not exposed to intervention. | Intervention physicians decreased the daily MED by 35 percent (74.1–48.3 mg) over the study period. In contrast, the control group of network physicians fell 14 percent (88.2–75.7 mg). | Did not adjust for physician characteristics or patient characteristics. | Moderate |
Westanmo et al. (2015)21 | VA Health System (one hospital and 11 clinics), Minnesota | Time series | Opioid Safety Initiative: guidelines to decrease high dose opioid prescriptions. Involved provider education and detailing. | Total number of patients on >200 mg/d MED decreased from 342 (0.67 percent) to 65 (0.12 percent); mean dose among those who received an opioid decreased from 43 to 23 mg MED daily (−47 percent). | Did not adjust for physician characteristics or patient characteristics. Patients could have left the VA health system. | Moderate |
Holman et al. (2014)22 | Orthopedic patients in Utah | Prospective cohort | Perioperative counseling and opioids prescribed for a maximum of 6 weeks post-op. | Patients in the intervention group were more likely to stop using opioids by week 6 compared with the control group (RR = 0.74 (95% CI 0.58–0.93)). However, there was no difference in opioid use past 12 weeks (RR = 0.98 (0.71–1.35)). | Treatment assigned based on one of two surgeons; the surgeon is a major source of confounding. Patients in the control group tended to be slightly older, with a lower proportion of women. Preoperative opioid use not measured. | Very low |
Fox et al. (2013)9 | Emergency physicians treating patients with dental pain | Retrospective chart review | Emergency department opioid prescribing guidelines | Opioid prescribing for patients with dental pain decreased by 17 percent (95% CI: 7–25 percent) after the policy. | Abstractors not blinded to study aims. No adjustment for physician or patient characteristics. Only 16 physicians in the practice. | Low |
Naliboff et al. (2011)23 | Pain clinic at a VA hospital in California | RCT | Compared liberal (dose escalation) and conservative opioid (stable dosing) prescribing guidelines for treatment of chronic pain. | No difference in prevalence of misuse the stable dose (22/67 (33 percent)) and the escalating dose group (16/62 (26 percent)) of the escalating dose group. The opioid dose in the escalating group increased 80 percent compared to 16 percent in the stable group. No difference in functional outcomes. | Loss to follow-up. | Moderate |
GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation rating of evidence; VA, veterans affairs; MED, morphine equivalent dose; mg, milligrams; CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.