Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 3;2023(2):CD013267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013267.pub3

Zaidat 2015.

Study characteristics
Methods Multicentre RCT with 1‐year follow‐up
Participants Estimated sample size: 250
Number randomised: 112
Inclusion criteria
  • Age 18–85 years

  • ≥ 1 symptomatic neurovascular lesion (70%–90% stenosis)

  • Hard TIA or stroke attributable to the territory of the lesion within the past 30 days (specific territories not reported)

  • mRS score ≤3


Exclusion criteria
  • Previous coil or clip placed in territory of target lesion within previous 6 months

  • Myocardial infarction within previous 3 months

  • Treatment with tissue plasminogen activator or other thrombolytic agent within 48 hours prior to randomisation

  • Major surgery or trauma within 2 weeks prior to randomisation

  • > 2 lesions with > 50% stenosis

  • CT or MRI evidence of intracranial haemorrhage, subdural or epidural haemorrhage, or tumour

  • Non‐atherosclerotic stenosis


 
Interventions ET plus CMT versus CMT alone
Outcomes Primary endpoints
  • Stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomisation

  • Hard TIA in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2–month 12 postrandomisation


Secondary endpoints
  • Stent success, defined as deployment of the PHAROS Vitesse stent across the target lesion with residual stenosis of 0%–20%

  • Percentage of stent group participants with any (symptomatic or asymptomatic) in‐stent stenosis (≥ 70%) confirmed by angiogram at 12 months

  • Percentage of stent group participants with symptomatic in‐stent restenosis (≥ 70%) confirmed by angiogram at 12 months

  • Percentage of medical therapy group participants with interventional procedure (e.g. angioplasty or stent) at 12 months

  • NIHSS score

  • mRS score

Funding source Initiated and funded by Micrus Endovascular
Notes ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00816166
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Patients meeting the final enrolment criteria after angiogram were randomly assigned 1:1 to either treatment with medical therapy alone or to medical therapy and PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular stent by a telephonic interactive voice response system (BioClinica Inc, Newtown, PA, USA). Randomisation was stratified by 2 factors: enrolment site and age (18–55 versus 56–85 years)..."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Patients meeting the final enrolment criteria after angiogram were randomly assigned 1:1 to either treatment with medical therapy alone or to medical therapy and PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular stent by a telephonic interactive voice response system (BioClinica Inc, Newtown, PA, USA). Randomisation was stratified by 2 factors: enrolment site and age (18–55 versus 56–85 years)..."
Comment: the study used software that carried out allocations in a closed environment, and nobody knew the allocation until after enrolment had been confirmed.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Quote: "The current trial was not double‐blinded due to the lack of feasibility of masking the stent group..."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: "... end point assessment by an independent neurologist who was not involved in the procedure reduced potential bias..."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Incomplete outcome data adequately resolved and unlikely to seriously alter the results with ITT analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All study outcomes were prespecified in the published protocol.
Other bias High risk Although the study was stopped early, the interim analysis showed superiority of CMT over ET and this result was unlikely to change. The industry funding source may be a source of bias.

BI: Barthel Index; CMT: conventional medical treatment; CT: computed tomography; DWI: diffusion‐weighted imaging; ET: endovascular therapy; ITT: intention‐to‐treat; MCA: middle cerebral artery; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; mRS: modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; PTAS: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting; RCT: randomised controlled trial; TIA: transient ischaemic attack.