Zaidat 2015.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Multicentre RCT with 1‐year follow‐up | |
Participants | Estimated sample size: 250 Number randomised: 112 Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | ET plus CMT versus CMT alone | |
Outcomes | Primary endpoints
Secondary endpoints
|
|
Funding source | Initiated and funded by Micrus Endovascular | |
Notes | ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00816166 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Patients meeting the final enrolment criteria after angiogram were randomly assigned 1:1 to either treatment with medical therapy alone or to medical therapy and PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular stent by a telephonic interactive voice response system (BioClinica Inc, Newtown, PA, USA). Randomisation was stratified by 2 factors: enrolment site and age (18–55 versus 56–85 years)..." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Patients meeting the final enrolment criteria after angiogram were randomly assigned 1:1 to either treatment with medical therapy alone or to medical therapy and PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular stent by a telephonic interactive voice response system (BioClinica Inc, Newtown, PA, USA). Randomisation was stratified by 2 factors: enrolment site and age (18–55 versus 56–85 years)..." Comment: the study used software that carried out allocations in a closed environment, and nobody knew the allocation until after enrolment had been confirmed. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Quote: "The current trial was not double‐blinded due to the lack of feasibility of masking the stent group..." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "... end point assessment by an independent neurologist who was not involved in the procedure reduced potential bias..." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Incomplete outcome data adequately resolved and unlikely to seriously alter the results with ITT analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All study outcomes were prespecified in the published protocol. |
Other bias | High risk | Although the study was stopped early, the interim analysis showed superiority of CMT over ET and this result was unlikely to change. The industry funding source may be a source of bias. |
BI: Barthel Index; CMT: conventional medical treatment; CT: computed tomography; DWI: diffusion‐weighted imaging; ET: endovascular therapy; ITT: intention‐to‐treat; MCA: middle cerebral artery; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; mRS: modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; PTAS: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting; RCT: randomised controlled trial; TIA: transient ischaemic attack.