Table 1.
Types of MNs | Years | Advantages | Disadvantages | Preparation methods | Refs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Solid MNs |
1970s put forward 1990s rise |
Excellent mechanical performance Strong puncture ability |
Low security High toxicity Complex preparation process Serious matrix residue |
Two-step etching method Free radical polymerization method Laser technology |
[26, 36, 68–70] |
Hollow MNs | 1990s |
High drug loading High drug delivery efficiency |
Poor mechanical performance Complex preparation process |
Solvent-casting method Microelectromechanical technology Laser technology |
[38, 39, 41, 70, 71] |
Dissolving MNs | At the beginning of the twenty-first century |
Good biodegradability High security Low toxicity Wide range of use |
Low drug loading |
Solvent-casting method Three-step centrifugation method Droplet-born air-blowing method Two-layer centrifugation method |
[72–79] |
Hydrogel MNs | At the beginning of the twenty-first century |
ISF extraction test Excellent swelling performance Adjustable mechanical strength Adjustable drug release rate |
Narrow scope of application Complex matrix composition Insoluble matrix materials |
Freeze–thaw cycle method Solvent-casting method |
[51, 79–81] |
Coated MNs | At the beginning of the twenty-first century |
High drug delivery efficiency Excellent mechanical performance |
Low drug loading Complex preparation process Low security |
Wet etch process Dip coating method |
[22, 59, 82–84] |